DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TAL
Docket No: 3624-09
5 February 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552,
-A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 21 January 2010, Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies. ‘
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 20 September 2000, and served
honorably until July 2006. Based on the information currently
contained in your record it appears that you were subsequently
involuntarily processed for administrative separation due to your
failure to pass three Navy physical fitness assessment: (PFA)
cycles in a four year period. In connection with this
processing, you would have acknowledged the separation action and
the: discharge authority would have approved a recommendation for
Separation. The record clearly shows that on 24 July 2006, you
were discharged with an honorable discharge. At that time you
were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code because you were not
recommended for reenlistment.
The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
overall record of service. Nevertheless, the Board concluded
these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your
reenlistment code, In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is
authorized when a Sailor is discharged due to PFA failure and not
recommended for reenlistment. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\p ses
I
Executive IN tor
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11116-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 7 February 2006 at age 21 and served without disciplinary incident.While...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09622-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded this factor wags not sufficient to warrant a change in the reenlistment code due to your failure to meet the Navy’s PFA requirements. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized when an individual fails his fourth PFA in a four year period.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04036-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result, on 21 June 2007, at the expiration of your enlistment, you were honorably discharged by reason of nonretention on active duty and were assigned an RE-3M reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10131-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change to the reason for your discharge or reenlistment code...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11698-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, the separation authority directed an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of performance and conduct, and on 20 April...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00352-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code because of your misconduct, which resulted in NUP, deficiencies in your performance, continuous failing of physical fitness tests, and the nonrecommendation for retention; all...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08513-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07452-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2009.. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01340-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, you were warned that failure of a third (or greater) PFA within a four year period could result in administrative discharge action. in this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized when a Sailor is discharged due to PFA failure and not recommended for retention.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01530-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 November 2010. Subsequently, on 1 June 2003 you were separated with an honorable discharge and given an RE-4 reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.