DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
SIN
Docket No: 03431-10
2 February 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 1 February 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
Injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
14 June 1988. The Board found you were referred for a medical
evaluation due to suicidal ideation. You were later diagnosed
with a schizoid personality disorder. Subsequently, you were
notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of
convenience of the government due to the diagnosed personality
disorder. You elected to waive the rights to consult counsel, or
submit a statement. On 24 March 1989, you received a general
discharge (type warranted by service record) due to the diagnosed
personality disorder. At that time, you were assigned a RE-4
reenlistment code.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and honorable service in the Army National Guard.
Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not
sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code given
your suicidal ideation and diagnosed personality disorder. An
RE-4 reenlistment code is routinely assigned under such
circumstances. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other-“matter not previously considered by the Board.
In thie regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
‘presumption of regulafity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burgen is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
DVR
W. DEAN PFE
Executive D
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07507-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04744-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In February 1994 you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13798-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2011. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error of injustice. Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government due to your diagnosed depressive disorder,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08086-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regu1atio~ 5 and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04177-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 11 December 2002 at age 19. Nevertheless, the Board found that these...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01269-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00403-11
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2011. On 15 August 1989 you were notified of pending separation action by reason of convenience of the government due to the diagnosed personality disorder. The Board concluded that the narrative reason for separation was administratively and procedurally correct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06448-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2010. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code or characterization of service, due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12529-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 September 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04029-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 04029-08 5 February 2009 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...