Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02517-10
Original file (02517-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

CRS
Docket No: 2517-10

26 May 2010

lication for correction of your
visions of title 10 of the United

 

el of the Board for Correction of Naval

Records, sitting in executive session, congidered your
application on 19 May 2010. Your allegations of error and

A three-member pan

regulations and procedures
Board. Documentary material considered by c
your application, together with all material submitted in support

thereof, your. naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was

stablish the existence of probable material

that you enlisted in the Navy on 9 December 2009.

The Board found
On 16 December 92009 you were given diagnoses of an adjustment

disorder and a personality disorder by a Navy psychologist. You
told the psychologist that you did not want to stay in the Navy
or receive any type of counseling. On 10 February 2010 you
received an entry level separation by reason of a condition, not
a disability, that interfered with your performance of duty. You
were assigned a reentry code of RE-4, 45 permitted by regulatory

guidance.

The Board concluded that you were properly assigned a reentry

code of RE-4. Tt is often assigned
by reason of a condition not a Gisability and particularly in

those cases where the Sailor has expressed a desire to be
discharged. Your contention that you are now “fine” does not
establish that your condition was misdiagnosed in 2009, oY

ide a basis for changing your present reentry code.
en denied. The names and

hed upon request.

prov
accordingly, your application has be

yotes of the members of the panel will be furnis
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

\yNag

W. DEAN PREI
Executive or

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01947-09

    Original file (01947-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A reentry code of RE-4 is authorized by regulatory guidance and is often assigned to individuals separated due to personality disorders, especially if they are deemed to constitute a threat to themselves or others. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06668-09

    Original file (06668-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01700 12

    Original file (01700 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 November 2012. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-8 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to a medical condition that existed prior to entry into the service and failed to complete initial training. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02528-10

    Original file (02528-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were discharged for the convenience of the government by reason of a personality disorder on 27 May 2005 and assigned a reentry code of RE-4, as...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09485-09

    Original file (09485-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2010. The Board found that you entered active duty in the Navy on 7 July 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09692-10

    Original file (09692-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2010. The clinical psychologist who conducted the evaluation gave you a diagnosis of a mixed personality disorder and recommended that you be administratively discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11645-10

    Original file (11645-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07580-10

    Original file (07580-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden*is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01911-10

    Original file (01911-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. It concluded that it would not be in the interest of justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04473-08

    Original file (04473-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your applitation on 8 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. That code is often assigned to Sailors discharged because of a mental disorder, and particularly in cases where there is evidence of suicidal ideation.