DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BUG
Docket No: 9485-09
16 June 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 15 June 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. The Board found that you entered active
duty in the Navy on 7 July 2009. On 31 July 2009, you referred
to mental health unit for an examination. You were diagnosed.
as suffering from post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) caused
by events which occurred prior to entering active duty. The
psychologist recommended that you be administratively separated
because of your disqualifying psychiatric condition. On 17
August 2009, you received an entry level separation due to
erroneous entry, and were assigned an RE-~4 reenlistment code.
In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your current desire
to serve in the armed forces. However, the Board concluded
that your reenlistment code should not be changed because of
your PTSD diagnosis. In view of the above, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to
have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered
by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
Lo Dead
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Dilrec
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10901-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10483-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2010. Upon completion of the program, you were recommended for separation with a general discharge due to commission of a serious offence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10668-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2010. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors _ were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reenlistment code, which was based on your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10496-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2010. Additionally, an individual so separated must receive an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09581-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR827 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 January 2015. The Board, in its review of your record and application with its supporting documentation, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, guch as your allegations that your discharge was improperly effectuated, a BOL recommendation was not given due consideration, and an injustice occurred when you were refused orders that would allow you to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09261-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 2009. On 28 June 1995, you were diagnosed with a schizoid personality disorder, and found to be a danger to yourself and others if not administratively separated. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant ‘to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00018-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequent fy,” when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11272 11
g. In March 2011, after being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. He had never been held back in any way from progressing through his Navy career due to security clearance issues and he was not aware that there was a deficiency that would disqualify him from competing for advancement. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13161-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. It appears that you were subsequently notified of administrative separation action by reason of fraudulent enlistment due to your failure to disclose your pre-service drug and alcohol abuse involvement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...