Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01890-10
Original file (01890-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

MEH
Docket No. 1890-10
31 Aug 10

This is in reference to your application for correction of naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August
2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by NSTC memo 1533 OD4/0737 of 15 Jul
10, a copy of which is attached.

The Board member’s also considered your request for a personal
appearance, however they found that the issues in the case were
adequately documented and that a personal appearance with or without
counsel would not materially add to the Board’s understanding of the
issues involved. Thus, your request for a personal appearance has
been denied.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion provided by the Naval Service
Training Command (NSTC). The Board found there was no error or
injustice in the procedures used or the evidence considered in your
disenrollment from the Naval Reserve Officers Training Corps (NROTC)
unit at the University of Washington. In the Board’s view, although
you were struggling with various aspects of the NROTC program, you had
the potential to continue in and complete the program. However, you
voluntarily disenrolled from the NROTC program before fully realizing
that potential. Further, the Board found that the education received,
at government expense, enhanced your opportunity for increased life-
long earnings and employment potential.
Docket No. 1890-10

It was noted that , Assistant Secretary of the Navy
(Manpower and Reserve Affairs), acting on behalf of the Secretary of
the Navy, approved your disenrollment, with recoupment of scholarship
funds, on 23 April 2008.

The Board found no compelling reason to i prior
decision. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material

error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Ld Denes

W. DEAN PF
Executive id, Oo

Enclosures

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09247-08

    Original file (09247-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ‘Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2009. The Board finds that, in light of the educational benefit you received, the regulations implementing the NROTC program and the terms of the scholarship agreement, it is not an error or an injustice for the Secretary of the Navy to require reimbursement Docket No. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07773-10

    Original file (07773-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On or about 13 March 2006, you appeared before a Performance Review Board {PRB} convened to inquire into your aptitude and performance. In the Board's view, your request to disenroll was a voluntary decision made of your own free will. Docket No._7773-10 were aware that you could continue in the NROTC program as well.?

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03176-08

    Original file (03176-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2009. The Board finds that, in light of the educational benefit you received, the regulations implementing the NROTC program and the terms of the scholarship agreement, it is mot an error or an injustice for the Secretary of the Navy to require reimbursement of the costs expended by the United States for your education. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02805-09

    Original file (02805-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, _. sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6478 14

    Original file (NR6478 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2015. The Board further found that you attended the Naval Science 401 class that was rescheduled for 7 September 2012 by showing up and signing for a textbook for the class. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05607-08

    Original file (05607-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT BOARD FOR CORRECTION 2 NAVY A WASHINGTON DC This is in reference the applicati mMaval record pursuant to the provi | | IA three-member panel of the Board Records, sitting in executive/ sess application on 24 November 2008. injustice were reviewed in ac¢orda regulations and procedures applica Board. Documentary material ¢onsi regulations and policies. your ¥ 1 t After careful and conscientious c record, the Board found that the insufficient to establish the exi error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08884-02

    Original file (08884-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. absence due to aptitude, performance review board. resignation from and elected not to appear before a On 31 January 2001 the commanding You then submitted your On 6 December 2000 you WI11 On 6 February 2001 the Bureau...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02031-01

    Original file (02031-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    effect, disenrolled yourself from the program by refusing to enroll in required Naval Science classes, and then attempted to procure a favorable separation for medical reasons. discharge for medical reasons. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01601-07

    Original file (01601-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by NSTC memo 1533 0D4 of 20 Dec 07 and NPC memo 1920 Ser 834/012 of 21 Feb 08, copies of which are attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03398-00

    Original file (03398-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 4 January 1994 you accepted an appointment as a midshipman at the Navy Reserve Officer Training Corps (NROTC) unit at the Georgia Institute of Technology. ...