Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01682-10
Original file (01682-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

REC
Docket No: 01682-1090

13 May 2010

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

 

Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL_OF RECORD "i

ate

    
  
 

Ref a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
(b}) MARADMIN message 303/08
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) HQMC MMSR-5 memo dtd 29 Mar 10
(4) Subjeéct’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a),

Petitioner, a commissioned officer of the United States
Marine Corps Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the last four of his six
unsatisfactory reserve retirement anniversary years be
removed and that he be placed on the Inactive Status List
(ISL) effective 12 August 2005 in accordance with reference

(b) .

  

>. The Board, consisting of vir a RR ad
ver reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 11 May 2010, and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below
should be taken on the available evidence of record.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,

regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner did

(on exhaust all administrative remedies available under.
existing law and regulations within the Department of the
Navy.

b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

c. Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on
12 August 1997. He was honorably discharged and was
accepted for the Fnlisted Commissioning Program on
16 August 1999. He received his commission and drilled
with the Reserves until 11 August 2003. He did not
participate again until 12 August 2009. Per reference (b),
the screening of his service record should have occurred
once he had not drilled for two years and should have been
placed on the ISL. In his case, this should have occurred

on 12 August 2005.

d. The Board requested an advisory opinion (enclosure
(3)} in this case from Headquarters Marine Corps, which
states that Petitioner should not receive relief based on
the fact that if he had been placed on the ISL, he would
not have earned any points toward his reserve retirement.

e. Due to the fact that the Petitioner was not placed
on the ISL correctiy, he now is in jeopardy of reaching his
career service limitation and the possibility of not being
selected for promotion to major. He is currently
participating with a reserve unit and is enrolled in the
Expeditionary Warfare School.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of aii the evidence of
record, and despite the recommendation in enclosure (3),
the Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants
favorable action. The Board notes his patriotism and
dedication to his country and bases its recommendation on
his loyalty, and desire to continue to serve his country.
More particularly Petitioner is participating with a
reserve unit and is attending the Expeditionary Warfare
School course. Accordingly, the Board concludes that, as a
matter of equity, relief in the form of placing him on the
ISL effective 12 August 2005 is appropriate. However, he
will be required to submit a minimal participation waiver
for the years from 2006 to 2009.
In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of
an injustice warranting the following partial corrective

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show
that he be placed on the ISL effective 12 August 2005.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected,
removed, or completely expunged from Petitioner's record
and that no guch entries or material be added to the record

in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board,
together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for
retention in a confidential file maintained for such
purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of
Petitioner's naval record.

d. That no further relief is granted.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is
a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in
the above entitled matter. .

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN : GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. The foregoing report of the Board is submitted for your
review and action.

lone

W. DEAN PFE
By direction

 

ROBERT L. WOODS

Assistant General Counsel!
(Manpower and Reserve Affairs)
+000 Navy Pentagon, Rm 40548
Washington, DC 20350-1000

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08299-01

    Original file (08299-01.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BJG Docket No: 8299-01 13 February 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11597-09

    Original file (11597-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Career Management Team has commented to the effect that Petitioner should have been ineligible for consideration by the FY 2008 Reserve Major Selection Board, convened on 23 January 2007, as he should have been placed on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04895-07

    Original file (04895-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BUG Docket No: 4895-07 21 November 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: os a REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06326-11

    Original file (06326-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BUG Docket No: 6326-11 22 August 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub jp EVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02697-01

    Original file (02697-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former warrant officer in the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 1 January 2001 but he requests removal of a failure of selection to CW04 and missed pay and/or retirement points from 19 December 2000 to the present. The advisory opinion points out that if the corrected request...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Jan 31 11_19_45 CST 2001

    i DSN Copy to: 21, 40) By direction o 703 614 9857.~2/ 2 .,~ 1920 PERS-911 ~7 JUN )999 SENT BY : IJSAED-CELMS-ED 7- 7-93 ;10:45AM COftS OF ENGINEERS— DEPARTMENT OF TH1 NAVY NAVY PISIONNIL COMMAND 17*0 ENTIOIITY DRIVI MILUNCTON TN 31055-0000 Comrnanc Personnel C From: To: Via: Subj: YOUR STATUS IN THE NAVAL RESERVE Ref: (a) SECNAVINST 1920.6A (b) COMNAVRESFORINST 1740.1 Per reference (a), an officer in the permanent grade of 1. lieutenant who has twice failed of selection for promotion to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09826-02

    Original file (09826-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), PERS-80, the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) office having cognizance over active and reserve officer career progression matters, has recommended that Petitioner's request to remove his failure of selection by the FY 03 Naval Reserve Line Commander Selection Board be disapproved. e. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), Pers-911, the NPC office having cognizance over Naval Reserve personnel administration, has commented to the effect...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02171-06

    Original file (02171-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing his failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 through 2006 Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards and restoring his status as a major in the Selected Marine Corps Reserve (SMCR). Finally, they noted that officers removed from the 15Th must have one year in an active status before...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06769-11

    Original file (06769-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he was placed on the Inactive Status List (ISL) on 17 July 2010, rather than 24 April 2011, and that his failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Reserve Major Selection Board be removed. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, W. Hicks, and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05817-03

    Original file (05817-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: He was considered by the mobilization disposition board convened in August 1995, which resulted in his transfer to the ISL on 1 September 1995. d. Relying on title 10, United States Code, section 12642, Petitioner contends that his failures of selection to commander should be removed (and by implication, his consequent discharge should be set aside), because...