DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BUG
Docket No: 767-10
13 October 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 5 October 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. The Board found that you served on active
duty in the Navy from 12 December 1986 until 5 June 1995, when
you were honorably discharged. On 29 January 1997, you
requested to be affiliated with the Navy Ready Reserve. On 30
April 2000, you were placed on the Inactive Status List (ISL)
as per your request due to your imability to drill. On 10
December 2003, you were notified that since you had been on the
ISL for at least a year, you were being screened for possible
involuntary discharge. It appears that you failed to respond
to this correspondence and were discharged from the Navy
Reserve on 31 May 2004.
In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to
serve in the armed forces. However, the Board concluded that
your Navy Reserve affiliation status should not be changed due
to your lack of activity and being properly placed on the ISL.
In view of the above, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
“It is regretted. that, the circumstances of your case are such
Pehat favorable agtion cannot be taken. You are entitled to
#ive the Board reconsider ‘its decision upon submission of new
“3nd material evidence or other matter not previously considered
by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
‘demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
“injustice.
Sincerely,
Wes
W. DEAN PFE
Executive D
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Jan 31 11_19_45 CST 2001
i DSN Copy to: 21, 40) By direction o 703 614 9857.~2/ 2 .,~ 1920 PERS-911 ~7 JUN )999 SENT BY : IJSAED-CELMS-ED 7- 7-93 ;10:45AM COftS OF ENGINEERS— DEPARTMENT OF TH1 NAVY NAVY PISIONNIL COMMAND 17*0 ENTIOIITY DRIVI MILUNCTON TN 31055-0000 Comrnanc Personnel C From: To: Via: Subj: YOUR STATUS IN THE NAVAL RESERVE Ref: (a) SECNAVINST 1920.6A (b) COMNAVRESFORINST 1740.1 Per reference (a), an officer in the permanent grade of 1. lieutenant who has twice failed of selection for promotion to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02507-01
You requested, in effect, removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 99 and 00 Naval Reserve Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Boards; that you be granted a special selection board for FY 99; that your discharge of 31 March 2000 from the Naval Reserve be set aside; that you be reinstated to the Inactive Status List lieutenant, with a date of rank adjustment to reflect seniority as if you had been placed on the ISL on 1 June 1998; and that your 16 June 1995 completion of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03797-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 31 May 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13164-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11080-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 2010. On 13 June 1983, you were honorably discharged from the Navy Reserve and were recommended for reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13350-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. pcoonsequently, wher, applying for a correction of an official naval ‘record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the gexistence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01682-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a commissioned officer of the United States Marine Corps Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the last four of his six unsatisfactory reserve retirement anniversary years be removed and that he be placed on the Inactive Status List (ISL) effective 12 August 2005 in accordance with reference (b) . He did not participate again until 12 August 2009. In his case, this should have occurred on 12 August...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11641-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08391-07
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from the Headquarters Marine Corps Career Management Team, dated 23 October 2007 with enclosures, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive DirectorEnclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYHEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11597-09
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Career Management Team has commented to the effect that Petitioner should have been ineligible for consideration by the FY 2008 Reserve Major Selection Board, convened on 23 January 2007, as he should have been placed on the...