DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX .
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 12049-09
22 February 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552. .
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 13 January 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 3
February 1979. On 23 May 1980 you received nonjudicial
punishment for an unauthorized absence and disrespect. On 18
July 1980 you were discharged under honorable conditions in
accordance with the provisions of the Expeditious Discharge
Program and assigned a reenlistment code of RE-3C.
The Board found that you did not qualify for an honorable
Gischarge or a change in the reason for discharge because your
conduct mark average was below 4.0. The Board did not accept
your unsubstantiated contention to the effect that the drinking
water in Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, was poisonous and caused
your misconduct.
an RE-3C reenlistment code is the most favorable code authorized
by regulatory guidance for individuals discharged under the
Expeditious Discharge Program. The Board thus concluded that
there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Ro 8S Fe
ROBERT D.~ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00289-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2008. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12425-10
You now request that the report for 2 October 1980 to 31 January 1981 be modified by addition of the reporting senior’s (RS’s) undated letter, and you again request removing the other two reports. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies, and the Board’s file on your prior case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05803-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that the discharge by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure and a correction to your record is not warranted.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02855-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 15 December 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1815 14
-A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04744-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In February 1994 you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01202-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2138 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 ‘March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 9 November 2013, you were honorably discharged from active duty at completion of required service and assigned an RE-3C reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3198-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2014. regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, Regu Lenore and policies. Consequently, when applying for-a correction of an official Naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05189-08
Sincerely, LN a © W. DEAN PFEIFF Executive Dire Enclosures DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR Docket No: 5189-08 7 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj}: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. In his application, Petitioner contends that he was misdiagnosed with a personality and adjustment disorder and that the Marine Corps made poor decisions based on his...