Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11661-09
Original file (11661-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

CRS

Docket No: 11661-0909
13 April 2010

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 March 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 11 August 1976.
On 1 September 1976 you admitted to the ship's medical officer
that you had engaged in homosexual acts both before and during
your service. On 29 September 1976 you received a general
discharge by reason of misconduct due to fraudulent entry for
failure to disclose your homosexual acts.

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors such as your youth, overall
service, and the contention to the effect you would have received
an honorable discharge under current standards regarding
homosexuality. The Board concluded that those factors were
insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your service. In
this regard, the Board noted that current policy provides for a
general discharge for an individual who fraudulently enlists.
‘Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

oo. 2,

W. DEAN PF
Executive Direc

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00419-06

    Original file (00419-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 26 February 1985 at age 17. The Board also considered the statement...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03537-01

    Original file (03537-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    During this period you Subsequently, on 30 December 1969, you were convicted by special court-martial (SPCM) of the foregoing 141 day period of UA and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for four months, reduction to and forfeitures were suspended for four months. and the reason I went UA in the first place was the fear of being caught in a homosexual act with someone in the service." My biggest fear since I can't On 28 January 1970 you were notified of pending administrative separation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02386-08

    Original file (02386-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire _record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to.establish the existence of probablé material error or injustice. He recommended a general discharge since you had admitted your homosexual activities, and agreed to waive your right to an administrative discharge board in return for a general discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04617-04

    Original file (04617-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful andconscientious conserdation of theentire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice YouenlistedtheMarine Corps on 5 July 1968 at age 17. Additionally, on 28 October 1968, during a physical...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10381-06

    Original file (10381-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. He recommended a general discharge when you openly admitted your homosexual activities, and agreed to waive your right to an administrative discharge board in return for a general discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02623-09

    Original file (02623-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06477-07

    Original file (06477-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result of concealing your pre-service homosexual activities, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2731-13

    Original file (NR2731-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, “regulations, and policies. an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official “Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00769-12

    Original file (00769-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the appropriate reenlistment code based on your circumstances.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04727-02

    Original file (04727-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 2 July 1954 you received NJP for three The punishment imposed was 14 The On 13 October 1955 you were convicted by a special court martial of unauthorized absence from 30 August to 17 September 1955, a period of 19...