DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 2835-10
5 May 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title i0 of the United .
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 14 April 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your appiication, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 25 August 1999.
On 23 October 2006 your commanding officer. recommended that you
be separated with an honorable discharge by reason of physical
standards. He stated that you had failed the physical fitness
assessment seven times in four years and failed to meet the body
composition standard five times. You were separated from the
Navy with an honorable discharge on 15 December 2006, by reason
of physical standards. You were assigned a reentry code of RE-
3F, as permitted by governing directives.
An RE-3F reentry code is the most favorable code authorized by
regulatory guidance for individuals discharged due to physical
standards. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or
injustice in your reentry code. accordingly, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN P
Executive
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05509-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10131-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change to the reason for your discharge or reenlistment code...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01921-99
An RE-4 reenlistment code means that the individual is ineligible for reenlistment without prior approval from Commander, Naval Personnel Command. Absent evidence to the contrary, a presumption exists that action by the Navy to discharge you by reason of "failed physical standards" was both appropriate and proper. Since you received the most favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulation, the Board could find no error or injustice in the assigned reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8586 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying tor a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0680 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01850-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that a reentry code of RE-4, while not required, may be assigned to Sailors discharged by reason of erroneous entry.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2422 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the ‘burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8481 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board_consisted ———..- of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, wien applying for a correction of an official naval record, thé burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0447 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0442 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...