DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100
BUG
Docket No: 11112-0609
2 August 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 28° July 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. The Board found that you entered active
duty in the Navy on 8 January 2007. At recruit training, you
were diagnosed with diplopia (double vision). On 16 February
2007, you received an uncharacterized entry level separation
for failing medical/physical procurement standards, and were
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your current desire
to serve in the armed forces and the doctor’s statement. The
Board particularly noted that although you do not currently
have any signs or symptoms of diplopia, your doctor stated that
“you tend to suppress [your] left eye, which would prevent any
diplopia.” The Board concluded that your RE-4 reenlistment
code should not be changed due to your failure to meet
medical/physical procurement standards. In view of the above,
your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to
have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered
by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
LDNonkS
W. DEAN PF
Executive D or
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07015-01
states that because he is free of diplopia, Petitioner should be The doctor considered cured. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the reason for the change in the reenlistment code. Therefore, the Board concludes that the Given the This code will alert RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that a. on 8 October 1999 he was assigned an RE-3E...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05195-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 30 November 2005. However, applicable regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08063-09
°° A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2010. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 10 August 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08063-09
°° A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2010. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 10 August 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00018-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequent fy,” when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13210-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10757-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2010. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to a medical condition that existed prior to entry into the service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13307-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2010. On 22 March 1994, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of defective enlistment and erroneous enlistment due to the diagnosed instability of your right shoulder which was not disclosed prior to your entry into the Navy. Based on the medical evaluation, you were processed for separation by reason of failed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01200-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 November 2010. However, on 23 July 2009, a medical evaluation was conducted and you documented that you had right knee pain and swelling prior to commencing your active duty, but failed to document that fact. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reentry code to individuals who are separated due to a medical condition that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05140-10
On 4 January 2010, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of failed medical and physical procurement standards due to the chronic pain which was not disclosed. Based on the medical evaluation, you were processed for separation by reason of failed medical and physical procurement standards due to the chronic pain syndrome. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...