DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON BC 20870-5100
WJH
Docket No. 8161-09
5 August 2009
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO ,
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments |
(2) NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/507 of 16 July 2009
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
veferred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show that he was advanced to MM2/E-5 as a result of the September
2008 advancement cycle (Cycle 200).
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr.
George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3
August 2009 and 5 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken
on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of ali the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. 8161-09
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:
a. Petitioner was advanced to MM2/E-5 as a result of the
September 2008 advancement cycle (Cycle 200).
b. The effective date of advancement is 16 June 20609 with a
Time-in-Rate of 1 January 2009.
c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of
the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
[(AElkter- A.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, III
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
5 August 2009 \ Y
W. DEAN PFEIL
Executive Dir
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00148-09
e. Enclosure (3) is Petitioner's reply to enclosure (2), maintaining that the contested report should be removed, as it would not have been submitted, had the STENNIS report not been temporarily lost. f. In enclosure (4), PERS-811, the NPC enlisted advancements office, noted that including the STENNIS report in Petitioner's PMA computation would not have changed the result, as that report was 3.8, which was Petitioner's PMA (his PMA was computed using the average of the contested 3.6 report...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00938-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E5/MM2 from the March 2008, Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, ‘Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 November 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04446-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s date of advancement be backdated from the March 2008, Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, 4Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12694-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to HM3/E-4 from the September 2008 Navy-wide cycle 200 advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01176-09
Therefore, Petitioner completed all of his required COUrses | and then his command allowed him to participate in the September 2008, Navy-wide advancement exam for AO3. In February 2009, Petitioner submitted a request to the Board for Correction of Naval Records for advancement to E-4/A03 retroactive to the September 2008 cycle. RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner was advanced to E-4/A03 from the September 2008, c ‘...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07108-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5700 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MAl from the February 2008 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01940-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus {SRB} and to establish an earlier effective advancement date. The Board, consisting of Mr.Pfeiffer, Mr. 4salman,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05064-09
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. However, because the command failed to submit a message withdrawing his recommendation to NPC and NETPDTC, prior to his advancement date, the Petitioner started to receive E-5 pay effective 16 August 2008,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10213-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's should be advanced to CTM2/E5 from the September 2008 (cycle 200) Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10433-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 March 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the...