Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08098-09
Original file (08098-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BAN
Docket No. 08098-09
23 November 2009

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

 

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD TCO@mgg

 

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/670 of 13 Oct 09
(3) Subject’s naval record

i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show Petitioner was advanced to E-4/DC3 from the March 2007 Navy~-
wide advancement exam.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on

23 November 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative rémedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application
has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the
Docket No. 08098-09
existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, wheré appropriate, as
follows:

a. Petitioner’s record is to reflect advancement to E- 4/DC3
effective 16 December 2007 with a Time In Rate date of 1 July 2007.

b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
fox Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6{c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled

Matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, ITI

Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)

of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e}) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

23 November 2009

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10961-08

    Original file (10961-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced from the March 2007, Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 23 November 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00307-09

    Original file (00307-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced from the March 2007, Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 April 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02901-09

    Original file (02901-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    naval record: 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment {STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and..Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06825-09

    Original file (06825-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant.to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s date of advancement to E-5/DC2 be backdated from the March 2007, Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10441-09

    Original file (10441-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner declined enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) as he was not married and had no eligible beneficiary. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 November 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07025-09

    Original file (07025-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR} program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03942-09

    Original file (03942-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR GORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-2 effective 30 May 2007, E-3 effective 21 November 2007," and E-4 effective 16 May 2008, 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01198-09

    Original file (01198-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/YN2, when first eligible in March 2008. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 June 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00234-09

    Original file (00234-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    234-09 24 March 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO _ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr.Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01898-09

    Original file (01898-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to.the provisions of reference (a} Subject, hereinafter ‘referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced to E-6/HT1 from the August 2008 Navy wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 November 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...