Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08028-09
Original file (08028-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BAN
Docket No. 08028-09
22 March 2010

 

This is in reference to your application for correction to your
deceased spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10
USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 22 March 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your deceased spouse’s naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the
Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Deputy
Director Casualty Assistance Branch (N135C) of 5 Feb 2010, a
copy of which is attached.

The Board noted that your spouse ( had one year

from the date of your marriage to enroll you in the RCSBP
program, and also during the 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006
open enrollment period; however, he failed to do so.
Additionally, we have contacted the Na Benefits Office
regarding your request that " s record
include his marriage to fF" That office has

advised that the record already lists you as ee eee
spouse effective 22 June 2002. Further information

ut your benefits and eligibilities may be obtained by calling
the Navy's Pay, Personnel & Benefits Branch at (901) 874-3362 or
by visiting
http: //www.npe.navy.mil/CommandSupport/PayPersSupport/.
Therefore, under these circumstances, the Board found
insufficient evidence of an error or injustice that would
warrant relief. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panei will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

Ens

W. DEAN PFEL
Executive Dil 1

—

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01778-04

    Original file (01778-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 6 April 2004, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In response to reference (a)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11104-09

    Original file (11104-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09563-02

    Original file (09563-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This statement identified him as a participant in the SBP Children only coverage, and he took no action to enroll his spouse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08329-00

    Original file (08329-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ecb Docket No: 17 July 2001 8329-00 This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05581-01

    Original file (05581-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 September 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse ’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Branch, PERS-622 and local Retired Activities Offices have been available to provide specific information to Chief Since Chief...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06861-09

    Original file (06861-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an , official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07993-02

    Original file (07993-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. His RCSBP child began receiving retired pay on 18 April 1984. coverage became SBP child coverage on that date.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05261-03

    Original file (05261-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. packages explaining the program and offering them an opportunity to enroll in the SBP during the 2 20 September 1973 open season.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01807-04

    Original file (01807-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 1807-04 11 May 2004 This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552 . A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. In addition, the Board considered the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03211-07

    Original file (03211-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Per reference (a), recommend BCNR not correct record to reflect that he enrolled his current spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)2. A~ditiona1ly, “Shift Colors” (the Navy’s quarterly retiree newsletter) was provided to him and contained information regarding~ the aforementioned