Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07962-09
Original file (07962-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100 CRS

Docket No: 7962-09
21 October 2009

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your.

naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
‘States Code section 1552. - it

A three- wenisex: panel of the Board for Correction of. Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your —
application on 21 October 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
‘your application, together with all material submitted in support

thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
-and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was -
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from
18 January 2006 to 26 March 2007, when you were discharged by
reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, witha.
general discharge. You were assigned a reentry code of RE-4, as
_ required by governing directives.

As your present reentry code is correct, and you have not
demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the
Board to assign a more favorable code as an exemption to policy,
there is no basis for granting your request. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service or reason for separation should be changed, since you
have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to
the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). You may do so oy
submitting the attached DD Form 293 to the NDRB.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the |
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval.
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

   
 

W. DEAN PPEI
Executive Di

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01909-09

    Original file (01909-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations . As your present reentry code is correct, and you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy, there is no basis for granting your request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04696-09

    Original file (04696-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. The Board did Rot consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07039-09

    Original file (07039-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable BEGEURCRy regulations and. As your’ present reentry code is correct, and you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy, there is no basis for granting your request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05585-08

    Original file (05585-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    | A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of “your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07531-09

    Original file (07531-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel’ of the Board for Correction of Naval o-oo: ‘Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07926-09

    Original file (07926-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05455-08

    Original file (05455-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the - ‘Board for Correction’ of Naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05455-08

    Original file (05455-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the - ‘Board for Correction’ of Naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01121-11

    Original file (01121-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BIG Docket No: 1121-11 31 October 2011 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. The Board noted that you were fortunate to receive a general characterization of service,since an other than honorable discharge is normally assigned when an individual is found to have committed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00477-09

    Original file (00477-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...