DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 5455-08
21 October 2009
This is in reference to your’application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the - ‘Board for Correction’ of Naval. .
. Records, sitting in executive session, considered your os
application on 21 October 2009. Your allegations of error. and
injustice were reviewed:in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
‘Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire’
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice,
The Board found that you served in the Navy Reserve from 27.
September 2004 to 21 May 2005, when you were ezeener ee 2s reason
of unsatisfactory participation, with a general discharge. You |
were assigned a reentry code of RE-4, as required by governing
directives.
As your present reentry code is correct, and you have not
demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the
Board to. assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy,
there is no basis for granting your request. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did
not request such consideration and you have not exhausted your
administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review
’ Board (NDRB). You may do so by submitting the attached DD Form
293 to the NDRB.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Ly Doo
W. DEAN PFEISFE
Executive Dilrec
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05585-08
| A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of “your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07926-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05455-08
A three-member panel of the - ‘Board for Correction’ of Naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07962-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ‘your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations -and policies. As your present reentry code is correct, and you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exemption to policy, there is no basis for granting your request. The Board did not consider whether your characterization...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04696-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. The Board did Rot consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01909-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations . As your present reentry code is correct, and you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy, there is no basis for granting your request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04147-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. The Board did not consider whether your reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07039-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable BEGEURCRy regulations and. As your’ present reentry code is correct, and you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy, there is no basis for granting your request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07531-09
A three-member panel’ of the Board for Correction of Naval o-oo: ‘Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08576-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...