DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 .
SIN
Docket No: 05324-09
4 June 2009
Dear amen
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States
Code, section 1552.
A three-member panei of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June
2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable
statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) on
28 November 2007, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the
Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the
existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, the
Board substantially concurred with the findines and conclusions of the
NDRB. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. |
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission @f new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
reguiarity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or iniustice.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00931-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2009. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01193-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2009. In addition, the Board considered a decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB}) dated September 17, 2007, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07166-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07011-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2099. In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) on 25 April 2007, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06374-09
error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative - regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06261-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2009. discharge should be upgraded since you must first apply to the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02884-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record ana applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your reason for separation should be changed, since you @id not request such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05576-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11023-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction, of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05388-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 5388-09 25 June 2009 - This igs in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...