DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
SUN
Docket No: 11001-08
5 October 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 29 September 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. ,
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
24 August 2004 at age 18. On 24 March 2005, you were diagnosed
with an adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood, and
a personality disorder.
On 3 May 2005, you were notified of pending administrative
separation action due to your diagnosed personality disorder.
On 17 May 2005, your commanding officer directed that you be
honorably discharged. You were so discharged on 2 June 2005.
At that time, you were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
alt potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, overall
record of service, post gervice accomplishments, and character
letters accompanying your application. Nevertheless, the Board
Fouud that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change
in your reenlistment code given che diagnosis of a personality
disorder and fact that you were a high visk for self naxe. An
RE-4 reenlistment code is routinely aseugned under such
ciremmetances. Accordingly, your applicat son pas beeu denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it 1g important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official. naval
record; the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
lo Qeadseh
W. DEAN PF
Executive D
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07780-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2009. On 6 February 2006, you were evaluated by a mental health professional and diagnosed with a personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06052-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 November 2009. Therefore, on 24 August 2009, you were separated with an honorable discharge and an RE-4 reenlistment code due to a personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10589-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Therefore, on 1 November 2005, you were separated with an honorable discharge and an RE-4 reenlistment code due to your diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11201-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2010. As a result, on 28 September 2009, while serving in paygrade E-2, you were so discharged and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00598-09
Based on the mental health evaluation, you were processed for separation by reason of other physical and mental conditions due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Nevertheless, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07070-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 24 September 1992, you received an honorable discharge due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01961-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations; and policies. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your misconduct and diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11385-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Further, the Board concluded that the severity of your diagnosed personality disorder was sufficient to support the assignment of an RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07721-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR Docket No: 7721-07 18 August 2008 This is in reference to naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. your application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United A three-member panel of the Boar Records, sitting in executive se application on 12 August 2008. injustice were reviewed in accor regulations and procedures appli Board. Further, an RE-4 reenlistment code is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04583-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your - application on 1 July 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...