DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-51004p 4
Docket No: 6084-09
29 June 2009
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: FORMER 35
NAVAL RECORD
REVIEW OF
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: {1) DD Form 149
(2) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner
applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by
changing the reason for discharge and the reentry code she was
assigned on 27 March 2009.
2. The Board, consisting of Messxs. (gies, GAM and
WIN ceviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 24 June 2009 and, pursuant to its reguiations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be |
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, reguiations and policies.
a”
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 6 January 2009. On
13 March 2009 she was diagnosed with a benign breast tumor. On
27 March 2009, she received an uncharacterized entry level
separation by reason of her failure to meet medical /physical
procurement standards and was assigned a reentry code of RE-4.
The discharge processing documents erroneously indicate that she
was Giagnosed with breast cancer.
c. Applicable directives require the assignment of an RE~4
reentry code when a Sailor is discharged for failing to meet
med#cal/physical procurement standards. A Sailor who is found to
be not physically qualified for enlistment may, in the
alternative, be separated by reason of erroneous entry and
assigned a reentry code of RE-3E or RE-4.
le
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. The Board believes that the reason for discharge should
be changed to erroneous entry since Petitioner was unaware of her
condition when she was accepted for enlistment. Accordingly, the
Board recommends that Petitioner's reason for separation be
changed to erroneous entry.
The Board also concludes that an RE-3F reentry code should be
assigned since there is no evidence that Petitioner ha@ any
performance or disciplinary infractions during her period of
service and her record does not otherwise Support the more
stigmatizing code of RE-4,
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on
27 March 2009 she received an entry level separation by reason of
erroneous entry and was assigned a reentry code of RE-3E.
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
Matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN ES be Tctos
Recorder Acting Recorder
>. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e}) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01756-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting hER naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 8 January 2009. The Board, consisting of Mr - ieee, Mr. im and Ms. WME ceviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 March 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. A Sailor who is found to be not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11724-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 1 September 2009. A Sailor who is found to pe not physically qualified for enlistment may, in the alternative, pe separated by reason of erroneous entry and assigned a reentry code of RE-3E or RE-4. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner's reason for separation be changed to erroneous entry.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07401-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100cpa Docket No: 7401-09 5 October 2009 ° From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER agagiieeeoseemes Meme REVIEW OF - NAVAL’ RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 8 August 2007. Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01544-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that her naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reentry code assigned on 9 January 2007. and Wma, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 March, 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. A Sailor who is found to be not physically qualified for enlistment may, in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06071-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval: records be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 20 May 2008. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. On 20 May 2008, she was separated from the Navy with an entry level separation by reason of her...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01601-09
The Board, consisting of Mr =i DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 1601-09 8 September 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER Qi OF NAVAL RECORD . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 19 May 2005. as ieee, and Ms. RB reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09343-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 16 June 2009. 2 a. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. A Sailor who is found to be not physically qualified for enlistment may, in the alternative,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06549-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS : 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100CRS Docket No: 6549-09 27 July 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy OF NAVAL RECORD a, a a Ct
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05071-09
Pursuant to thé provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by _ changing the reentry code he was assigned on 25 March 1999. Ciiimenen and Ms. MEE reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 October 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 20 January 1999.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00863-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reentry code assigned on 26 November 2008. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 February 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner’s reason for separation be changed to...