Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11224-10
Original file (11224-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BAN
Docket No: 11224-10
2 August 2011

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

   
 

Subj:

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure
(1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his other than
honorable (OTH) discharge of 23 April 1993, be upgraded to an
honorable discharge.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gorenflo, Storz, and Whalen,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28
July 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as

follows:

a, Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 5 May 1992, and
served without disciplinary incident until 23 February 1993, when
he received nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for two specifications
of unauthorized absence and missing ship’s movement. Therefore,
he was recommended for separation due to commission of a serious
offense with a general discharge. He waived his right to consult
with counsel and an administrative discharge board.
c. The Chief of Naval Personnel disagreed with Petitioner’s
commanding officer's recommendation, and on 23 April 1993, he was
separated with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge, and an
RE-4 reentry code, due to commission of a serious offense.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants partial
favorable action.

The Board initially notes that although Petitioner received one
NIP, the commanding officer recommended a general discharge.
Although the Board does not condone his misconduct, it believes
that an OTH discharge is too harsh. Therefore the Board
concludes that as a matter of clemency, a general discharge is
more appropriate than the OTH discharge now of record. In view
of the above, the Board recommends the following limited
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing
the OTH discharge assigned on 23 April 1993, toa general
discharge.

b. That Petitioner’s request for corrective action that
exceeds the foregoing is denied.

c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed, or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

d. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with
a copy of this Report of proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(¢c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(¢c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's proceeding

in the above entitled matter.
\

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN GEORGE

Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

\pus

W. DEAN P EB
Executive rector

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05850-10

    Original file (05850-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the other than honorable (OTH) characterization of her discharge of 28 June 1993 be changed to general. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Tew and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 March 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03840-11

    Original file (03840-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S$. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the other than honorable (OTH) characterization of his discharge of 15 March 1989 be changed to general. d. On 6 October 1988, Petitioner was notified of pending administrative discharge processing with an OTH discharge due to misconduct (commission of a serious offense).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03280-09

    Original file (03280-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100 SJN Docket No: 03280-09 22 February 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a} 10 U.S.C. Mr Rend Mr. 4 - reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06278-10

    Original file (06278-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a Former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the general characterization of his discharge of 28 October 1993 be changed. On 19 October 1993 the discharge authority directed separation with a characterization of service warranted by the service record. The Board's finding is based on his length of service and periodic conduct marks.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06067-10

    Original file (06067-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the characterization of his other than honorable (OTH) conditions discharge assigned on 14 August 1992 to an honorable discharge. The Board also notes his combat experience, including his CAR, and finds that as a matter of clemency, his discharge should be upgraded. c....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5497 13

    Original file (NR5497 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SJN Docket No: 5497-13 10 July 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records. The Board, consisting of Mr. Clemmons, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Marquez, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03024-11

    Original file (03024-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing. On 2 December 1992, he ‘completed his required active service, was separated with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service, and was transferred to the Marine Corps Reserve. c. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner’s naval record be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07273-11

    Original file (07273-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the characterization of his other than honorable (OTH) conditions discharge issued on 22 August 1978 to general. It was recommended that he be administratively separated with a type warranted by his service record characterization of service. However, due to his misconduct...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10538-10

    Original file (10538-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the characterization of his other than honorable (OTH) conditions discharge issued on 22 August 1978 to general. Tt was recommended that he be administratively separated with a type warranted by his service record characterization of service. On 22 August 1978, he received...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04993 12

    Original file (04993 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the characterization of his other than honorable (OTH) discharge issued on 28 February 1991 toa fully honorable discharge. On 14 February 1991, the Navy Personnel Command directed that he be separated with a type warranted by service record characterization due to...