Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03598-09
Original file (03598-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

Lec

Docket No. 3598-09
20 Jan 10

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO _

 
 
  

 

>

Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552

Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
{2) NPC Memo 1430 Ser 811/755 dtd 20 Nov a9
{3) Subject ’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter

- referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board

 

requesting that the applicable naval record be corrected to show
Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on

11 January 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available —
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. 3598-09
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

a. Petitioner was advanced to paygrade E-5 effective
16 September 2008.

b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and

deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true complete record of the
Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

[ilbean #2

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLYTAM J. HESS;
Recorder Acting Recorder
5, Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)

of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.

20 January 2010

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10548-09

    Original file (10548-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's advancement to EM1/E6 should be backdated from the March 2008 (cycle 199) Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11094-09

    Original file (11094-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 - Lee Docket No, 11094-09 20 January 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO eens et es Ref: (a) Title 16 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board _ requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10213-09

    Original file (10213-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's should be advanced to CTM2/E5 from the September 2008 (cycle 200) Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13223-09

    Original file (13223-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08273-09

    Original file (08273-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    fo er a ‘ GS fa rn ar “Sie” DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 S Ae Lec Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligibie. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and “salman, reviewed Petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00082-10

    Original file (00082-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to ag Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was either advanced to E-4/LS3 from the March 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam or received Passed but Not Advanced (PNA) points from the March 2009 advancement exam cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12694-09

    Original file (12694-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to HM3/E-4 from the September 2008 Navy-wide cycle 200 advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12875-09

    Original file (12875-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12791-09

    Original file (12791-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 March 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10043-09

    Original file (10043-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, salman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 February 2010, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures...