Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03477-09
Original file (03477-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON BC 20370-5100

 

DIC

Docket No. 3477-03
16 June 2009

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of ‘Naval Records,
sitting.in executive session, considered your application on

15 June 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. _In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1430 Ser 811/256
dtd 24 Apr 09, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this conmection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

Tt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. Inthis ~
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice,

Sincerely,

TR pee, ea

FereW.: DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
_ 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

 

1430
Ser 811/256
24 Apr O09

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD- FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via: PERS-31¢

 

 

Subj: BCNR PETITION Ico «

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11913-08

    Original file (11913-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner is requesting to not be paid her $1,000.00 Enlistment Bonus Source Rate (EBSR} and the $5,000.00 Enlistment Bonus College Credit (EBCC) and cancel her 12 month agreement to extend.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05372-08

    Original file (05372-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02265-09

    Original file (02265-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on &8 dune 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is’ on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02553-08

    Original file (02553-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03070-09

    Original file (03070-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner is requesting advancement to E5. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01914-09

    Original file (01914-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per references (a) through (da), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01914-09

    Original file (01914-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per references (a) through (da), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02788-09

    Original file (02788-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-51600 LCC Docket No. 2788-09 26 May 09 Dear

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02808-09

    Original file (02808-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2009. Per references (a) and (b), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR)} only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01587-09

    Original file (01587-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your previous case, docket number 11271-07, was denied on 15 May 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) [or use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.