Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02525-09
Original file (02525-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 .
TRG
Docket No: 2525-039

18 June 2009

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF <3

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

 

Enel: {1} Case Summary
{2} Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), ‘Petitioner, a
former member of the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this
Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show
that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged
on 24 April 2004.

2. The Board, consisting of Mré—Rigepge, Mr. Sj and Ms.

deme -ey i ewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 17 June 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

.b. Although it appears that Petitioner's application was
not filed in a timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to
waive the statute of limitations and consider the application on
its merits.

c. Petitioner served on active duty in the Regular Navy
from 5 July 1978 until his early release on 1 July 1983, a period
of 4 years, 11 months and 23 days. In accordance with
regulations then in effect his reserve anniversary wads then
established to begin on 2 July 1983. During the next 16 years,
Petitioner earned 15 qualifying years. Therefore, at the end of
| his anniversary year on 1 July 1999 he was credited with 19
years, 11 months and 23 days cf qualifying service for reserve
retirement purposes.

 

d. Petitioner's performance evaluation for the period

BS
ending 26 June 1999 is adverse. The evaluation comments state
that he had not completed required documentation to maintain his
security. clearance and that he was not maintaining satisfactory
Grill performance. Therefore, he was being transferred to the
Standby Reserve and was not recommended for reaffiliation, He
earned no further qualifying years and was honorably discharged
on 24 April 2004. He was born on 3 September 1956 and will not
be eligible for retired pay until 3 September 2016.

e. The Board was informed that the regulations have changed
and an anniversary date remains the same as long as there is no
break in service. If this had been in effect at the time of
Petitioner's service he would have had 20 years of qualifying
service.

£. The Board did not request an advisory opinion in this
case. However, the Board is aware that the Navy Personnel
Command has routinely recommended corrective action when an
individual is qualified for reserve retirement and errors
occurred which prevented retirement.

g. The Uniform Retirement Date Act, 5 U.S.C. 8301, requires
that the effective date of any retirement be the first day of the
month.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. The Board believes that Petitioner must have thought
that he had 20 years of qualifying service when he quit drilling
in 1999. Since he would have 20 years of qualifying under
current regulations, the Board concludes that his record should
be corrected. to show that he is qualified for reserve retirement.
This can be accomplished by transferring 14 retirement points
from the anniversary year ending on 1 July 1989 into the
anniversary year ending on 1 July 1988.

Since Petitioner now has over 20 years of qualifying service the
record should then be further corrected to show that he
transferred to the Retired Reserve. Given the requirements of
the Uniform Retirement Date Act, the retirement should be.
effective on 1 April 2004, vice the discharge of 24 April 2004
now of record.

The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings
should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future
reviewers will understand his status in the Retired Reserve.

RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by transferring
14 retirement points from the anniversary year ending on 1 July
1989 into the anniversary year ending on 1 July 1988.

b. That Petitioner's record be further corrected to show that he
transferred to the Retired Reserve effective on 1 April 2004,
vice the discharge of 24 April 2004 now of record.

c. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's
naval record.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and

complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
Matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN Bas} rors
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6{e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))}
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

  

Executive Dil

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10069-08

    Original file (10069-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX TRG WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 10069-08 19 February 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF «gigi Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. At the end of his anniversary year on 18 April 2001 he was only credited with 42 of the 50 retirement points necessary for another qualifying year. Although Petitioner requested that the transfer to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08021-08

    Original file (08021-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 . TRG Docket No: 8021-08 6 May 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1} Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record 1.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06197-07

    Original file (06197-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100TRG Docket No: 6197-07 25 April 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00123-00

    Original file (00123-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former commissioned officer in the United States Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 8 April and then to the Retired List, 2000. After a review of the chronology of service prepared Petitioner, Pers 9 noted that he earned 32 retirement points the anniversary year ending 9 September 1975 and, in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00662-08

    Original file (00662-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve and to the Retired List vice being discharged on 5 December 1989. However, the Board is aware that the Navy Personnel Command has routinely recommended corrective action when an individual is qualified for reserve retirement and the individual did not realize...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07010-02

    Original file (07010-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former commissioned officer in the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 1 June 2002. This can be accomplished by moving five retirement With this correction Petitioner will have 20 qualifying years and, since he was otherwise in good...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00445-07

    Original file (00445-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100TRGDocket No:445-0723 February 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member in the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged.2. The best way to correct the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02198-02

    Original file (02198-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve, vice being discharged on 31 December 2001 or any other date. However, the Board is aware that Headquarters Marine Corps has routinely recommended corrective action in similar cases when an individual is qualified for reserve retirement and there is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04778-98

    Original file (04778-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a retired officer in the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to establish entitlement to retired pay at age 60. On 10 August 1998 he was informed that he was not eligible for retired pay because he had only been credited with 17 years of qualifying service. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04894-09

    Original file (04894-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BUG Docket No: 4894-09 13 August 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: ia, REVIEW OF NAVAL ORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 28 Apr 09 2) HQOMC MMMSR-5 memo dtd 23 Jun 09 w/enele (3) Subj’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed...