DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL REGORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No. 02481-09
14 April 2010
This ig in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 8 April 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
'gupport thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 22 May 1990. You underwent a pre-
separation physical examination on 18 December 1990, and were
found qualified for separation. You reported a history of
frequent trouble sleeping and depression or excessive worry
which you attributed to situational worry caused by your
impending administrative Gischarge. On January 1991, you were
discharged for the convenience of the government due to
sleepwalking, a condition not considered to be a disability
under the laws administered by. the Department of the Navy. The
Department of Veterans Affairs denied your request for service
connection for hypertension and sleepwalking on 4 June 1991.
In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were
unfit to reasonably perform the duties of your rate by reason of
physical disability, rather than unsuitable for service due to
sleepwalking, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective
action in your case. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken, You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Lo Qa
W. DEAN PF
Executive restor
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04839-01
Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNET memorandum attached. which was later reversed to a "waiver recommended th Unit, San and fused to accept a restricted line designator, thus or disenrollment from the NROTC Program.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06213-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 April 2001. The Board noted that it has no authority to take any action which would affect the finality of your conviction by special court-martial, and that its authority in this case is limited to correcting your record as a matter of clemency. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09989-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4848 13
You may apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) for a possible change. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. However, the Board concluded that your reentry code should not be changed because of your diagnosed sleepwalking disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09097-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you served active duty in the US Army from 6 August 1985 to 21 November 1991,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12563-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2010. You were discharged by reason of misconduct/drug abuse on 25 April 1997, with a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04596-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2001. In this connection, the Board rejected your contentions to the effect that you suffered from post traumatic stress disorder at the time of your release from active duty in 1971, and that you were unfit by reason of physical disability at that time. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03196-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, post...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09970-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2010. The Naval Discharge Review Board denied your request for upgrade of your discharge on or about 4 February 2000. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06756-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...