DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH:ddj
Docket No: 4839-01
25 September 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title
10 of the United States Code, section
1552.
25 September 2001. Your allegations of error and
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNET memorandum
attached.
OTES of 30 August 2001, a copy of which is
1533
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
CHIEF OF NAVAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING
250 DALLAS ST
PENSACOU FLORIDA
32508-5220
From:
To :
Chief of Naval Education and Training
Department of
Naval Records
the Navy,
Board of Correction of
Subj:
EX-MIDSHIPMAN
Ref: (a)
Your Memo
of 27 Jul 01
1533
OTEE
,3
0 AUG
2001
_.-
1 .
Jn response to reference (a),
disenrollment case.
oning physical,
a thorough review was made on Mr.
During
he was seen by the M
Diego where he "mentioned" that he was there for "sleepwalking"
that he didn't know how long he had the problem. He was found not
physically qualified due to the sleepwalking by Chief, Bureau of
Medicine and Surgery,
for a Restricted Line designator"
which was granted by CNET.
which was later reversed to a "waiver recommended
th Unit, San
and
fused to accept a restricted line designator, thus
or disenrollment from the NROTC Program.
Further, it
even though he had the problem as early as 1991.
was determined that he had never mentioned that he had a sleepwalking
problem,
granted a scholarship in 1995 and continued on that scholarship for
three years before mentioning it to the Mental Health Unit
The Commanding Officer, NROTC Unit, feels that Mr
above.
was not honest, sincere,
obtained the scholarship under fraudulent conditions and in addition
continued to accept scholarship benefits under
Only when it was time for commissioning, did
problem.
nor did he ever intend to be
fraudulent
corn
He was
as noted
conditions.
ention his
e
Because of the refusal to accept a commission in the
3.
Restricted Line and the fraudulent conditions under which
received his NROTC Scholarship, on September 2
Navy ordered recoupment of all benefits in Mr.
are no new facts revealed in this case that wo
the recoupment action.
Mr.,
reversal of
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09041-06
The Board, consisting of Mr. Dawson, Mr. Tew, and Ms~ Roy, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 October 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Enclosure (2)g. On 13 January 2003, the same date of the BUNED memo, Petitioner entered the following student statement in CNET 1533/32, Disenroliment Report: “(I am) dropping NROTC due to physical inabilities to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08884-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. absence due to aptitude, performance review board. resignation from and elected not to appear before a On 31 January 2001 the commanding You then submitted your On 6 December 2000 you WI11 On 6 February 2001 the Bureau...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05497-01
Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03176-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2009. The Board finds that, in light of the educational benefit you received, the regulations implementing the NROTC program and the terms of the scholarship agreement, it is mot an error or an injustice for the Secretary of the Navy to require reimbursement of the costs expended by the United States for your education. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09247-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ‘Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2009. The Board finds that, in light of the educational benefit you received, the regulations implementing the NROTC program and the terms of the scholarship agreement, it is not an error or an injustice for the Secretary of the Navy to require reimbursement Docket No. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01890-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02805-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, _. sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07736-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 14 May 2002 7736-01 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy RECORD OFH (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Therefore, the Board concludes that the recoupment action should be suspended until he completes the two year active duty requirement he incurred while in NROTC. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that a. recoupment of his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07773-10
On or about 13 March 2006, you appeared before a Performance Review Board {PRB} convened to inquire into your aptitude and performance. In the Board's view, your request to disenroll was a voluntary decision made of your own free will. Docket No._7773-10 were aware that you could continue in the NROTC program as well.?
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04663-01
Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosures DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 4663-01 2 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 0 ~mIuu-.m”~ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. In response to congressional interest in Petitioner’s case, Headquarters Marine Corps stated, in part, as follows: ... On September 22, 1999, (Petitioner)...