DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100
TJIR ,
Docket No: 2020-09
11 March 20106
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 March 2010. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations
of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Although your record is incomplete, it appears that you enlisted
in the Navy on 10 January 1975 at age 19 and served without
disciplinary incident. Subsequently, you were processed for an
administrative separation by reason of convenience of the
government. The discharge authority directed discharge under
honorable conditions, and on 3 November 1975, while serving in
paygrade E-2, you were issued a general discharge and were
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
The Board, in its review of your record, again although
incomplete, and application, carefully weighed all potentially
mitigating factors, such as your youth and desire to upgrade your
discharge and change the narrative reason for separation for
medical purposes. It also considered the medical documentation
provided in support of your case. Nevertheless, the Board
concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant
recharacterization of your discharge or a change in the narrative
reason for separation. Accordingly, your application has been
denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5277 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Although the discharge documentation is not in your record, it appears that the medical board’s recommendation was approved because the separation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10461-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 September 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00177 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were also convicted by civil authorities of assault and sentenced to two days in jail.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10212-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7997 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08060-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 2009. It further appears that you were administratively processed for separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge or a change to your narrative reason for separation because of the seriousness of your drug related misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR568 14_Redacted
Although your appli cation was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of jus t ice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your ~pplication on its merits _ A three - member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in execut ive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015 . Regarding your claim of PTSD, the Board may only consider assertion of PTSD when an applicant Rresents clear evidence that the PTSD is service connected...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05231-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4121 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Although your SPCM was dismissed, your NJP offense occurred in August 1977, making you ineligible for a Good Conduct Medal.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2423 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS _7a1 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 : TUR Docket No: 2423-14 °23 March 2015 This is in reference’ to your application for correction of your "naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United ~ States Code, Section 1552, ; Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your application on...