DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BUG
Docket No: 1537-09
10 June 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
AB three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 June 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps,
dated 13 February 2009 minus enclosures, a copy of which is
attached. .
- After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinion and the memorandum for the record.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to
have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered
by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
Was
W. DEAN PF R
Executive D ctor
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROAD
QUANTICO, VA 22134-5103
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1640
MMER / RE
13 Feb 09
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj: BCNR BEELICATLON IN THE CASE OF
ie: SUBJ: RE-~CODE
Encl: {1) NavMc 118 (11)
{2} NavMC 118 (12)
(3} NavMC 10132 (UPB)
(4) Cmdr, Recruit Depot East’s ltr 5800 SJA/MIO of 11 Jun 04
(5) NavMc 10835A (DC, 20040414-20040628)
(6) DD iis
(7) NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00526-09
Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. QED service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that at the time of separation he was assigned a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00534-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2009. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion, from Headquarters Marine Corps dated 15 January 2009, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07182-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review ‘of the.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07550-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 16 August 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06256-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion, from Headquarters Marine Corps dated 11 June 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07561-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session considered your application on 1 November 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. XXXXX service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3C was correctly assigned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03607-09
Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ‘@xistence of probabfe material error or injustice. After a review of all relevant information, we concur with the _ professional evaluation of QED qualifications for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06961-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 1 August 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 05016-04
In additio~i, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Hea~quarters Marine Corps dated 14 September and 4 November 004, copies of which are attached. We recommend that Petitioner’s request for relief be denied. 4 Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECT ON OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR) APPLICATION Finally, as for Petition~r’s request that her reenlistment code be changed, we concur witFh the Performance Evaluation Review Branch comments that Petltioner’s code was correctly assigned and that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08561-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...