DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 2492-03
25 June 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 25 June 2003.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application,
together with all material submitted in support
your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
thereof,
and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 18 March
2003, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
In this connection, the Board substantially
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
2220 RUSSELL ROA
VIRQINIA 22
QUANTICO.
Y
MARINE CORP S
D
134.5 103
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1040
MMER/RE
8 2003
MAR 1
MEMORANDUM'FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
Encl:
FORMER
SUBJ:
DD Form 149 of 30
Dee 2002
s service record has been reviewed and it has
that his reenlistment code of RE-4B was correctly
eenlistment code was assigned based on his
overall record and means that he was not recommended for
reenlistment due to in-service drug involvement.
4, 1995 by
A review of the
2.
was honorably discharged on July
reason of Completion of Required Active Service.
administrative portion of his service record indicates that he
was counseled concerning a pattern of misconduct, not being
recommended for promotion, reduction in grade, illegal drug use,
and not being recommended for reenlistment.
portion of the record shows that he received two nonjudicial
punishments under the Uniform Code of Military Justice for
offenses which included failure to obey a lawful order, wrongful
use of cocaine, and una
on August 30, 1994, Mr.
book entry acknowledging assignment of the RE-4B reenlistment
code.
It is also noted that
absence.
signed an official service record
The disciplinary
After a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters
qualif-
3.
concurs in the professional evaluation of
ications for reenlistment at the time of separation.
is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or upgraded as
a result of events that occur after separation or based merely on
the passage of time.
Once a code
4.
The enclosure is returned for final action.
luation
Review Branch
Personnel Management Division
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05157-03
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 11 June 2003, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00587-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRSDocket No: 587-0720 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2007. The Board also considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03072-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 8 April 2003, a copy of which is attached. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05205-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 8 June 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03682-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 19 April 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07550-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 16 August 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07621-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Branch, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03607-09
Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ‘@xistence of probabfe material error or injustice. After a review of all relevant information, we concur with the _ professional evaluation of QED qualifications for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01921-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2008. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, and notwithstanding the advisory opinion, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02807-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 28 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. overall record and means that he was not recommended for reenlistment at the...