Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00981-09
Original file (00981-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

     

  

S
Ci
NZS

SMS
Docket No: 981-09
16 April 2009

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
TO: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF @j——/iill

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

 

Encl: (1) Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former
member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting an RE-3
reenlistment code vice the RE-4 that was issued on 7 January 2003.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. iis, » v RMS and

Ms. ‘aie: reviewed Petitioner's aiegatcions of error’ and injustice
on 15 April 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the
Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, advisory opinion,
and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner’s application was filed in a timely manner.

c. On 10 June 2002, Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps at
age 18. On 2 November 2002, a medical evaluation recommended that he
be discharged after he was diagnosed and received treatment for
chronic left hip flexor adductor tendonitis and greater trochanteric
bursitis. On 2 February 2002, his commanding officer initiated an
entry level separation by reason of convenience of the government due
to a condition not a disability. In connection with this processing,
he acknowledged the separation action and submitted a statement
indicating that he wanted to reenilst after he recuperated.

On 23 December 2002, the separation authority approved the
recommendation and directed an entry level separation by reason of
convenience of the government due to a condition not a disability.
On 7 January 2003, he was so discharged and assigned an Ri -4
reenlistment code.
d. In his application, Petitioner requests an RE-3 reenlistment
code so that he may be considered for reenlistment and participation
in the Navy Reserve Officers Training Corps Scholarship Program.

He further states that he was discharged due to a condition not a
disability and there were no other physical problems. With his
application, he provided a physical examination dated

1 December 2008, which found that he has no hip abnormalities.

e. Attached to enclosure (1) is an advisory opinion from
Headquarters Marine Corps (MMER), which states, in part, as follows:

... [Petitioner's] record has been reviewed and it has
been determined that at the time of separation he
should have been assigned a reenlistment code of
RE-3P, which means failure to meet medical/physical
standards...

... [Petitioner] was administratively discharged

by reason of a physical condition, not a disability...
his record shows that he received a counseling
addressing his medical condition...the

assignment of the RE-4, that entry [sic] lacks

correct justification... .

...this headquarters recommends changing
[Petitioner's] reenlistment code to RE-3P...

£. Regulations authorize assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
to members who are discharged due to a condition not a disability.
Regulations also authorize assignment of an RE-3P reenlistment code
in such cases.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants relief.
Specifically, the Board concurs with the advisory opinion. In this
regard, the Board finds that there is no justification in the record
to assign him an RE-4 reenlistment code, since he has no disciplinary
action and he was discharged due to a condition that was not a
disability. Therefore, the Board concludes that his reenlistment
code should be changed to RE-3P.

RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he
was issued an RE-3P reenlistment code on 7 January 2003, vice the

RE-4 that was issued on that date.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's review
and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete

record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN lo
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of
the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

| he oh,

W. DEAN PFEIF
Executive Dir Oo

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00674-05

    Original file (00674-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged by reason of physical disability and assigned a reentry code of RE-3, vice under honorable conditions by reason of a condition, not a disability, interfering with his performance of duty, with a general discharge and a reentry code of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02165-00

    Original file (02165-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    LeBlanc reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 August 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code, RE-3P. (e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08843-09

    Original file (08843-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former lance corporal of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting the narrative reason (“Personality Disorder”), JFX1 separation code, and RE-4 reenlistment code be changed. His case was forwarded to the separation authority, and on 4 August 2005, he received a general discharge and was assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code due to a “Personality Disorder”. The Board finds an impropriety in his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11095-07

    Original file (11095-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 also reflects an RE-3P reenlistment code. As such, the Board concludes that an RE-1B reenlistment code, which is also authorized by regulatory guidance for a Marine who was not recommended for retention, but was otherwise recommended for reenlistment at the completion of his obligated service, is more appropriate for Petitioner's Situation. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000242

    Original file (MD1000242.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 January 2003, the Separation Authority approved the recommendation for administrative separation and the Applicant was discharged under Honorable conditions with a re-enlistment code of RE-3P (Failure to meet physical/medical standards - Recommended by CO for re-enlistment upon removal ofdisqualifying factor).The Applicant provided her U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) claim for service-connected compensation results (with enclosures)for the NDRB’s consideration in regards to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05837-07

    Original file (05837-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 16 March 2003, he was so discharged and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.f. The reenlistment code was correctly assigned and was based on his overall record.This Headquarters concurs in the professional evaluation of [Petitioner’s] qualifications for reenlistment at the time of separation.CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that Petitioner’s request warrants partial relief. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08609-08

    Original file (08609-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    TUR Docket No: 8609-08 7 August 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF & -Ref: (a} 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change of his narrative reason for separation and reenlistment code, and that his record reflect that he was advanced to the next higher grade. The discharge authority...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02955-03

    Original file (02955-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In addition, the Board noted that your DD Form 214 erroneously indicates that you were discharged...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05038-09

    Original file (05038-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a}, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was discharged for a reason other than fraudulent entry. The Board, consisting of Messrs. ae: RFs nd eI eV i ewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 March 2010 and, pursuant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05597-08

    Original file (05597-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR Docket No: 5597-08 7 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD Oni ie... Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 ' (b) MARCORSEPMAN MCO P1900.16F USMC, Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the...