Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05597-08
Original file (05597-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

TIR

Docket No: 5597-08
7 August 2008

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD Oni

ie...

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 '
(b) MARCORSEPMAN MCO P1900.16F

 

USMC,

 

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1)

with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed
and that he be entitled to full separation pay.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs 

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11095-07

    Original file (11095-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 also reflects an RE-3P reenlistment code. As such, the Board concludes that an RE-1B reenlistment code, which is also authorized by regulatory guidance for a Marine who was not recommended for retention, but was otherwise recommended for reenlistment at the completion of his obligated service, is more appropriate for Petitioner's Situation. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11221-06

    Original file (11221-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The reenlistment code was properly assigned and was based on his overall service record.A review of his service record indicates that he was counseled concerning failure to be at his appointed place of duty; drunk driving; underage drinking; breaking restrictions; disobedience of orders; not being recommended for promotion; failure to comply with current Marine Corps weight standards; and3poor performance while assigned to the Battalion weight control program. The service record entry dated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10339-10

    Original file (10339-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was entitled to half separation pay at the time of separation from active duty service. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Exnicios, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 31 May 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01550-09

    Original file (01550-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN ' Docket No: 1550-09 17 November 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the. Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0081 14

    Original file (NR0081 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Tew, and Ms. White-Olson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he received an RE-3P vice an RE-3C reentry code on 14 July 1986. b. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01736-06

    Original file (01736-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 12 June 2007, and the advisory opinion from the HQMC Manpower Information Operations, Manpower Management Information Systems Division (MIO), dated 30 January 2007, copies of which are attached. The responsibility to implement this policy rests with the commander ~ not meet the prescribed weight standards, the commander~- must take specific actions prior to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500509

    Original file (MD0500509.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [Concerning your assignment to the Marine Corps Body composition program. Applicant counseled that he will be processed for administrative separation due to failure to maintain the Marine Corps standards. The Commanding Office is recommending that the Applicant receive a General (Under Honorable Conditions).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02064-00

    Original file (02064-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record , From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps submitted an application to this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 15 April 1998 but was retained in the Marine Corps until he qualified to retire. "has an alternate weight standard The fitness report 68" At that time, he...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201966

    Original file (MD1201966.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600722

    Original file (MD0600722.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Advised being assigned to the Weight Control Program as of 020207), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.020318: Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (concerning unsatisfactory progress on weight control program. The factual basis for this recommendation was the Applicant’s diagnosis of Bilateral Quadriceps Tendonitis, failed to meet height and weight standards while on 2nd assignment to...