Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00203-09
Original file (00203-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

LCC
Docket No. 203-09
17 Nov 09

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

   

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

(2) PCS Orders to 9a:
(3) TEMADD orders to iin
(4)

(5)

 

CNO memo 7220 Ser N130C2/09U0618 of 18 Aug 09
Para U10402.B86, JFTR

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in
effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show
Petitioner is entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for
designated location of dependents during the period he was on
Temporary Additional Duty (TEMADD) assignment in support of
Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) to@iiiiRiiliiibast rom

4 September 2006 to 3 August 2007. ©

 
   

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and
Zsalman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
on 26 October 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Pocumentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
Docket No. 203-09

a. Prior to filing enclosure (1) with this Board,
Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies afforded under
existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. From 9 August 2004 to 6 July 2006, Petitioner was
assigned to the ihe ern WM The
ass ignmen teaaiaiaamamiaana Miizwas considered to be arduous sea
duty. During his tour of duty he
dependents were residing in a designated location , 

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009768

    Original file (20130009768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * self-authored memoranda, subject: [Applicant], Request for BAH Waiver to Retain BAH at Current Duty Location, dated 20 March 2013 and 10 April 2013 * e-mail correspondence * BAH waiver request template * document entitled Instructions to Obtain a BAH Waiver for PCS * ALARACT 021/2008 * ALARACT 324/2012 * letter, dated 11 March 2013, regarding his son's standing as a student * Officer Record Brief (ORB) * orders * Military Leave and Earnings Statement CONSIDERATION OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004737

    Original file (20120004737.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He stated: a. he is a Title 32 AGR Soldier mobilized in support of overseas contingency operations, and requests a Secretarial BAH waiver based upon his previously approved exception to policy to receive BAH at his last duty station of (Adelphi, MD, 20783) due to his command directed No/Low cost move, effective 21 April 2011, to a unit mobilizing within 12 months of his assignment on 30 August 2011; b. effective 21 April 2011, he was transferred to HHC, 29th Combat Aviation Brigade, Edgewood...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015179

    Original file (20130015179.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The JFTR states that when Reserve Component (RC) Soldiers are ordered to active duty and a PCS order is not issued, BAH rate is based on the primary residence location at the time the Soldier was ordered to active duty. However, if the member is called or ordered to active duty and a PCS order is not issued, BAH/OHA rate is based (paid) on the primary residence location at the time called/ordered to active duty"; and c. there is no distinction made in the PPG or JFTR for AGR BAH when the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023040

    Original file (20110023040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Orders Number 057-10, dated 26 February 2010, shows the following: a. the applicant was ordered to PCS from a USAREC unit in Wheat Ridge, CO to a USAREC unit in Texarkana, TX. Records show the applicant was part of an Army Regulation 15-6 investigation which concluded in August 2010. PCS orders provided by the applicant show he was assigned to Wheat Ridge, CO, and he subsequently received orders to Texarkana, TX, with a reporting date of 10 August 2010.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07697-01

    Original file (07697-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner accepted this assignment with the d. Petitioner tried repeatedly to get his orders modified assigning him to Camp Pendleton so that he would be entitled to payment of BAH for Camp Pendleton. Twentynine Palms and Camp Pendleton is as follows: The BAH comparison rate for cy 2000 2001 2002 Twentvnine Palms Cp Pendleton Difference $499.70 $576.70 $637.70 $833.70 $$1,032.70 $$1,244.70 $334.00 $456.00 $607.70 Petitioner has been working and living in the Camp Pendleton area and has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020933

    Original file (20130020933.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * his marriage license * Orders 213-50, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Monroe, VA, dated 1 August 2011 * a copy of his wife's teaching contract with New Beginnings Charter School, Bedford – Stuyvesant, Brooklyn, New York, dated 15 August 2012 * Orders 271-1008, Installation Management Command (IMCOM) – Pacific Region, Military Personnel Division, Republic of Korea on 27 September 2012 * a lease agreement for a residence in Queens, NY * a memorandum for record (MFR), signed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08414-07

    Original file (08414-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    8414-07 11 Dec 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08675-00

    Original file (08675-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this case the member's old PDS was not OCONUS so this article of the JFTR does not apply. 4. reassigned from a PDS in DC) and his dependents remained in the same residence as when the IAW reference (a) article U5222- member served at the old PDS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000170

    Original file (20070000170.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was given orders to PCS to Fort Hood with a report date of 15 September 2006, and a deployment date of 23 October 2006. Given the applicant moved his family members in good faith based on the information contained in his PCS orders, this DA official recommends the Army Board of Corrections to Military Records (ABCMR) grant authorization to the applicant for the following: movement of dependents at Government expense (including authority for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020481

    Original file (20100020481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The opinion states: a. the applicant was receiving the proper BAH entitlement for his permanent duty station locations, Fort Stewart, GA and Fort Polk, LA. In order to qualify for a BAH Secretarial waiver in 2009/2010, his spouse must have continued to reside at his previous duty station, Fort Stewart, GA during his second deployment from Fort Polk, LA. ____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board...