Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12468-08
Original file (12468-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX TRG

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 12468-08
24 March 2009

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF ##

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

 

Encl: (1) Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
member of the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board
requesting that her record be corrected wherever necessary to
show that she is serving as a petty officer first class (ITI;
paygrade E-6) rather than as a petty officer second class (BU2;
paygrade E-5).

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. 

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09629-06

    Original file (09629-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that the record be corrected to show that she was advanced to petty officer second class (PN2; E-5), and by changing her reenlistment code.2. The Board believes that her six years of excellent service and the fact that she was unable to pass the PFA only because of her foot problem support her contention that a nonrecommendation for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07749-06

    Original file (07749-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that her record be corrected wherever necessary to establish eligibility for reserve retirement. h. The Board is aware that the Navy Personnel Command has routinely recommended corrective action in those cases where an individual is qualified for reserve retirement, but has been discharged and not retired. This action can be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03866-11

    Original file (03866-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    f. In September 2010, Petitioner participated in the E-5/A02 advancement exam again. g. Upon being notified of the deficiency in her clearance status, in February 2011, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. She had advanced from E-1 to E-4.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08237-07

    Original file (08237-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 October 2007 with enclosure, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03087-09

    Original file (03087-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 03087-03 7 August 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF 3 i Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removal of a nonjudicial punishment (NUP) of 1...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04874-07

    Original file (04874-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 4874-07 15 February 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF eligi Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record l. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member in the Navy Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting, in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05282-06

    Original file (05282-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    5282-06 31 October 2006 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), the Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she completed her initial training on 15 October 2004 in order to establish bonus eligibility. 5282-06 b. Annex A to DD Form 4 singed by the Petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3279 14

    Original file (NR3279 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Soe, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY RES 2 cae i BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NPR03279-14 17 December 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: [REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1CO

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05889-08

    Original file (05889-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a}, Petitioner, a former member of the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged: on 25 January 2007. The DD Form 214 issued at that time shows that he was a petty officer first class, but the pay grade was entered as E-5, d. On release from active duty,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03609-06

    Original file (03609-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member in the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected in some manner to allow him to qualify for retirement.2 The Board, consisting of MrMr - and Mr reviewed Petitioner’s a1legation of error and injustice on 26 June 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...