Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12180-08
Original file (12180-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

HD:hd
Docket. No. 12180-08
5 November 2009

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.)

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 5 November 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval
Operations dated 4 March 2009, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was.
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion in
concluding your Spring 2007 (17 June 2007) body composition -
assessment measurements and failure should stand. Concerning
your Spring 2007 (18 June 2007) physical readiness test, which
you passed, the Board particularly noted that the medical waiver
document you: provided showed you were expressly authorized to
use the elliptical in place of the 1.5-mile run/walk. The Board
further observed that your score on the elliptical was "good
medium." In view of the above, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Np

W. DEAN PFEI
Executive Dir

 
  
 

 

Enclosure .

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09520-08

    Original file (09520-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 16 December 2008 with enclosure, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08345-08

    Original file (08345-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05015-08

    Original file (05015-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, \Weacs } W. DEAN PFET Executive Dir : Enclosure e,_; 5420 OPNAV N135 12 AUG 2008 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (PERS-3LC2) Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMEM TIONS IN THE CASE OF Ref: (a) OPNAVINST 6110.1H (b) BCNR Case File...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07942-06

    Original file (07942-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely,W.DEAN PFEIFFER Executive DirectorEnclosure5420 OPNAV Nl35 20 Nov 06MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08550-07

    Original file (08550-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEAN PFEIFFERExecutive DirectorEnclosure 5420 OPNAV N135 13Nov07MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (PERS-3LC2) Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OFRef(a) BCNR Case File 08550-07(b) OPNAVJNST 6110.1 HEnd: (1) PRIMS Record (NAVPERSCOM Official Data)1. Service member petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and/or remove injustices in the sailor’s Physical...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06182-06

    Original file (06182-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Service member petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors andfor remove injustices in her Physical Readiness Information Management System (PRIMS) record.2. Reference (b) and (c) states in enclosure (3), paragraph 3. f. 2.,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04048-07

    Original file (04048-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05240-06

    Original file (05240-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    05240-06 1 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March 2007. DEAN Executive Enclosure5420 OPNAV N151c30 Aug 06MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (PERS-3LC2)Subj: RE S FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION$...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06804-06

    Original file (06804-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    06804-06 1 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March 2007. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnishedby the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 3 October 2006 with enclosure, a copy of which is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08416-09

    Original file (08416-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 9 September 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.