Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05240-06
Original file (05240-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 HD:hd
Docket No. 05240-06
1 March 2007





T his is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 30 August 2006, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in m in d that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,


W.       DEAN Executive


Enclosure

5420
OPNAV N151c
 30 Aug 06
MEMORANDUM FOR   EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (PERS-3LC2)
Subj: RE S FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION$ IN THE CASE OF


 Ref: (a) OPNAVINST 6110.i
(b)    PRIMS Record
End:     (1) BCNR Case File 05240-06
1. Subject member petitioned the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and/or remove injustices in his service record.
2. Per enclosur e r equests to have his Spring/Fall 2004 and Spring 2005 Body Composition Assessments (BCA) reflect “pass within standards”, contending that the PRIMS data was not entered due to ship decommissioning.
3.       As per reference (b), member has no entries for Spring/Fall 2004 and Spring 2005 BCA.
4. Reco mm endation. Based on the Physical Readiness Program and evidence contained in this file, though there is missing data for the entire Physical Fitness Assessment (PFA), it does not adversely affect the member. Physical Readiness Program office does not accept evaluations to make changes in PRIMS. Member must provide measurements and scores for the PFA’s that are not entered.
5. This is an advisory memorandum for the use of the Board for Correction of Naval Records only. Please contact YN1(AW) for further information.



~ \> (<Y



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05015-08

    Original file (05015-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, \Weacs } W. DEAN PFET Executive Dir : Enclosure e,_; 5420 OPNAV N135 12 AUG 2008 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (PERS-3LC2) Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMEM TIONS IN THE CASE OF Ref: (a) OPNAVINST 6110.1H (b) BCNR Case File...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10765-07

    Original file (10765-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sailor petitioned...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10765-07

    Original file (10765-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10765-07 29 July 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03107-08

    Original file (03107-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2008. Sailor petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and/or remove injustices in his Physical Readiness Information Management System (PRIMS) record. This is an advisory memorandum for the use of the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06182-06

    Original file (06182-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Service member petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors andfor remove injustices in her Physical Readiness Information Management System (PRIMS) record.2. Reference (b) and (c) states in enclosure (3), paragraph 3. f. 2.,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03589-08

    Original file (03589-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2009. Sailor petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and/or remove injustices in her Physical Readiness Information Management System (PRIMS) record. This is an advisory memorandum for the use of the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03304-03

    Original file (03304-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Do not concur with the request to remove the NAVPERS 1070/613 from the record.-equests this action based on his statement that he did not fail any portion of the Spring 2001 PFA cycle. The recommendation to deny Petty Office request to remove the NAVPERS 1070/613s is based on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00668-08

    Original file (00668-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sincerely, Enclosure 5420 OPNAV N135 05 Mar 08 From: Ms. Heather L. Pouncey, Physical Readiness Program Manager (OPNAV N135) To: Heather Topping, Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-31C) Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF Ref: (a) OPNAVINST 6110.1H (b) BCNR Case File 00668-08 Encl: (1) PRIMS Record (NAVPERSCOM Official data) 1. Sailor petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and/or remove...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05990-06

    Original file (05990-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnishedby the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 3 October 2006 with enclosure, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. DEAN PFEIFFERExecutive DirectorEnclosure5420 OPNAV N135 3 OCT 06MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02330-07

    Original file (02330-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved