_23 September 1982 at age 26.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX REC
WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100 Docket No: 11747-08
28 October 2009
tion for correction of your
This is-in reference to your applica
ons of Title 10 of the United
naval record pursuant to the provisi
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, gitting in executive session, considered your
application on 15 October 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative.
ures applicable to the proceedings of this
regulations and proced
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with alii material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. .
d began a period of active duty on
On 15 June 1993, you received
for failure to obey a lawful order,
nd communicating a threat. You
reduction in pay grade and 60
You enlisted in the Navy an
nonjudicial punishment. (NIP)
provoking speech or gestures a
received a forfeiture of $1,000,
days of restriction.
On 22° January 1986, you were Gischarged from active duty while
serving in paygrade E-3 and were not recommended for reenlistment
due to substandard behavior. At that time, you were assigned an
RE-4 reenlistment code. The Board found that you had reached
service limitations for pay grade E-3.
the Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as overall record of
service. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were
not sufficient to warrant a change in the reenlistment code,
which was based on your disciplinary record, substandard
behavior, and failure to meet professional growth eviteria, In
this regard, an RE-4. reenlistment: code is required when an
‘ndividual is discharged at the expiration of his term of active
obligated service and
ia not recommerded Lor retention.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that —
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00695-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08629-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 February 2011. On 20 July 2010, you were discharged from active duty while serving in pay grade E-6 and were not recommended for reenlistment due to substandard behavior. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13047-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 January 2010: Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is discharged at the expiration of his term of active obligated service and is not recommended for retention. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01070-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were counseled and informed that you would receive a reenlistment code of RE-4 upon your separation as you were not recommended for retention.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10687-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval | Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 4 January 1999, you received NJP for failure to pay your government credit card bill.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13330-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00014-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05153-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2009. Additionally, you were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action. In this regard, an RE~4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is discharged due to misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00524-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06371-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...