DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 10987-08
1 February 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Codé section 1552. ;
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 December 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 27 June 1997.
You received nonjudicial punishment and were convicted by a
summary court-martial for offenses that included an unauthorized
absence and disrespect. You underwent psychological evaluation
on 27 July 1998 and were given a diagnosis of a severe
personality disorder., On 25 August 1998 you received a general
discharge by reason of a personality disorder.
In its review of your application, the Board carefully considered
your contention to the effect that you suffered from
posttraumatic stress disorder rather than a personality disorder,
but found it unsubstantiated and insufficient to warrant the
approval of your request for corrective action. Accordingly,
your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\s
Naat qi
Executive tar
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08437-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and and policies. The Board concluded that your discharge was proper and Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder, and such a code is normally assigned when there is a finding that an individual is at risk for self harm. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02428-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 29 May 1997 at age 20. You were also recommended for Level III alcohol...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04477-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable mate ial error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 27 October 1998 at age 21. You then served without incident until 6...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01925-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Since you have been treated no differently than others separated from the Navy for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08740-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 April 2002. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03015-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it noted that your expiration of active service(EAS)date was extended from 4 to 17 January 1998, due to the lost time you had accumulated because of your unauthorized absences. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01885-01
15 December 1998 and assigned an RE-3P reenlistment code. You were honorably discharged on Incident to your The Board also noted your contentions that the medical incident was a transient The Board noted the letters of Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3P or RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are discharged by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04018-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. “R/O (rule out) Psychosis ”, you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11757 12
In this regard, there is no evidence in your record, and you provided no evidence, that your processing documents were falsified. The Board found that a reentry code of RE-4 is authorized by regulatory guidance in cases such as yours and is often assigned to service members separated by reason of a personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08559-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 January 2011. Further, there is no evidence which demonstrates that you suffered from a mental disorder that warranted a medical separation or retirement discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.