Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03015-03
Original file (03015-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JRE
Docket No. 03015-03
27 October 2003

This is in reference to your application for 
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

c-orrection  of your

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 2 October 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

Your allegations 

of.error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You were counseled on 21 November 1995 and 17

The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 5
January 1994.
December 1996 for deficiencies in performance and conduct.
received nonjudicial punishment on 8 May 1997 and 15 August
1997, for unauthorized absences, dereliction of duty, and the
unauthorized use of a government telephone for personal use. On
25 August 1997, you were counseled concerning your failure to
undergo level III alcohol rehabilitation treatment.
You were
discharged under other than honorable conditions on 16 January
1998 by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

You

or that you were unfit for duty

It noted that you were

The Board rejected your contention to the effect that you were
diagnosed as suffering from "bipolar depression" during your
enlistment in the Marine Corps,
by reason of physical disability.
diagnosed as suffering from an adjustment disorder, relationship
problems, and a personality disorder, which are conditions not
considered disabilities under the laws administered by the
Department of the Navy.
for separation by reason of the personality disorder, you had no
right to be separated for that reason rather than misconduct.
It did not accept your contention to the effect that your
enlistment had expired prior to your discharge for misconduct.
In this regard, it noted that your expiration of active
service(EAS)date  was extended from 4 to 17 January 1998, due to
the lost time you had accumulated because of your unauthorized
absences.
The Board concluded that your discharge was properly
characterized with a discharge under other than honorable
conditions.
interest of justice for it to upgrade your discharge.

The Board was not persuaded that it would be in the

Although you could have been considered

In view of the foregoing,
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

your application has been denied.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

You are entitled to have

In this regard,

Sincerely,



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08559-10

    Original file (08559-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 January 2011. Further, there is no evidence which demonstrates that you suffered from a mental disorder that warranted a medical separation or retirement discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01222

    Original file (MD99-01222.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    921211: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. 930218: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under Honorable conditions (General) for the Convenience of the Government due to a Personality Disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychiatric evaluation. The characterization of service should have been based on the applicant’s service record.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00596

    Original file (MD00-00596.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    970409: Commanding officer recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board voted unanimously that the reason shall remain the same and that the discharge was proper but inequitable (D and E).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8290 13

    Original file (NR8290 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Dac Docket No. ‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00310

    Original file (MD01-00310.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Unauthorized absence and your continued lack of reasonable effort evidenced by your poor performance are violations of the UCMJ and will not be tolerated.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.951017: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501067

    Original file (MD0501067.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “medical issues.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: “DD 214 Citations Medical Records in service Mental Health established in Marines was being discharged with notable mental distress from Marines seen by psychiatrist at home. 040517: Commander, 2d Marine Aircraft...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01061

    Original file (MD99-01061.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Memorandum from Dr J_ L_ S_ M.D., Colonel, U.S. Army, Medical Corps Psychiatrist (2 copies) Letter from the Honorable Mr. P_ to Board of Correction of Naval Records dated May 12, 1999 Letter from Dr. S_ A. M_, M.D recommending overturning discharge to honorable dated October 15, 1998 USMC Medical Records (23 pages). After a thorough review...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00545

    Original file (MD04-00545.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.981008: GCMCA , CG, MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA directed the Applicant's discharge under honorable conditions (general) for convenience of the government due to a personality disorder.981009: Counseled: Applicant informed by CO that he is not recommended for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06186-01

    Original file (06186-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that his service was characterized as honorable, and that he was retired vice discharged by reason of misconduct. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy and Zsalman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10014-07

    Original file (10014-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 17 October 2002, a service record entry was made which stated that a psychiatric evaluation conducted on 28 August 2002, diagnosed you with dysthymia and having an avoidant personality disorder, both of which existed prior to enlistment, and concluded by recommending an expeditious...