DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BUG
Docket No: 8722-08
10 June 2009
Dear #&
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552,
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 June. 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. The Board found that you entered active
duty in the Navy on 2 March 1986. You received one nonjudicial
punishment for drunk and disorderly conduct. On 18 July 1986,
- you were counseled regarding an 18 day period of unauthorized
absence and warned that further misconduct could result ina
less than honorable discharge. On 17 November 1989, your
ordnance certification was revoked. On 5 January 1990, you
were counseled regarding your failure to report unsecured
erdnance. On 18 April 1990, your recommendation for
advancement to second class petty officer was withdrawn due to
your failure to demonstrate rating knowledge and
professionalism. At this time, you also received an adverse
performance evaluation. On 4 September 1990, you received your
second adverse performance evaluation. On 5 September 1990,
you were released from active duty and were given an honorable
discharge at the end of your obligated service, and were
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. On 23 July 1993, you were
honorably discharged from the Naval Reserve and were
recommended for reenlistment.
The Board, in its review of your entire record, carefully
weighed all potential mitigation, such as your youth and
honorable discharge. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that
these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization
of your reenlistment code due to your misconduct and poor
performance. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to
have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
- and material evidence or other matter not previously considered
by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFE
Executive D or
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08707-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2009. On 6 June 1990, you received an adverse performance evaluation, and were counseled regarding UA and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative - separation. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your repeated misconduct and substandard performance.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 09391-97
The record also shows that during the period from 1 April 1986 to 30 November 1987 you received two consecutive adverse performance In the second evaluation for the period 1 April to evaluations. You were honorably discharged on 1 May 1990 However, you were assigned duties outside At that time you In reaching its decision the Board noted your disciplinary record, adverse performance evaluations and the fact that you elected separation prior to removal from quality control. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05094-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. July 1990 you were honorably released from active duty at the expiration of your enlistment and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04367-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Although the facts and circumstances surrounding the withdrawal of command's recommendation for advancement and retention are not shown in available records, the Board concluded that an adverse evaluation for the two month period prior to your release from active duty provided sufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06026-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01027-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and Board. The punishment imposed was a forfeiture of $207 On 23 On 5 August 1990, you were honorably released from active duty and transferred to the Marine Corps Reserve. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05284-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09322-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06765-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2008. On 20 November 1986 you received nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for a failure to go to your appointed place of duty and were reduced to petty officer second class. At that time, you had completed 17 years, 11 months and 10 days of active service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8267-13
A three-member ‘panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2014. with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate ‘the existence of probable material error or injustice.