Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07781-08
Original file (07781-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

HD:hd
Docket No. 07781-08
16 July 2009

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

 
   

To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: sy Boa
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 30 Jul 08 W/ateackmenva

(2) PERS-832B memo dtd 16 Jun 09
{3} PERS-32 memo dtd 26 Jun 09

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance
evaluation report for 16 November 2007 to 29 March 2008, a copy
of which is at Tab'A. He also requested removing all other
reference to his nonjudicial punishment (NJP) of 12 March 2008.
The Board did not consider this request, as his record contains
no other reference to the NJP (enclosure (2) refers).

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and
Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 16 July 2009, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and -
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Im correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the Navy
Personnel Command (NPC) office having cognizance over.
performance evaluations has commented to the effect that
Petitioner's request to remove the contested report has merit
and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (3), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
therefrom the following enlisted performance evaluation report
and related material:

Period of Report
Date of Report Reporting Senior From To

28Mar08 USN 16Nov07 29Mar08

 

b. That there be inserted in Petitioner's naval record a
memorandum in place of the removed report, containing
appropriate identifying data concerning the report; that such
memorandum state that the report has been removed by order of
the Secretary of the Navy in accordance with the provisions of
federal law and may not be made available to selection boards
and other reviewing authorities; and that such boards may not
conjecture or draw any inference as to the nature of the report.

ac. That appropriate corrections be made to the magnetic
tape or microfilm maintained by NPC.

d. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

e. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and

complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

' matter.
Brita dd [LOO nS
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
é(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Ct.

ly. .G
W. BEAN PFE

Executive D

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08467-08

    Original file (08467-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the marks and comments of the enlisted performance evaluation report for 10 July 2005 to 15 March 2006 (copy at Tab A), in accordance with a letter dated 14 August 2008 from the reporting senior (at enclosure (1)) because the report erroneously reflected that he had failed the Spring...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR933-13

    Original file (NR933-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Lapinski and Messrs. Dikeman and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 March 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. f. In enclosure (6), PERS-32, the NPC office with cognizance over performance evaluations, commented to the effect that in light of enclosures (4) and (5), Petitioner’s performance evaluation record should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08777-08

    Original file (08777-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In enclosures (2) and (3), OPNAV N135 and the NPC office with cognizance over fitness reports, respectively, commented to the effect Petitioner's requests should be denied. e. In enclosure (6), the NPC office with cognizance over fitness reports noted that Petitioner's reporting senior had declined to submit a supplemental report, notwithstanding the PRIMS correction. In enclosure (9), that office noted the fitness report corrections recommended in enclosure (6} and stated hig SSB request...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00148-09

    Original file (00148-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    e. Enclosure (3) is Petitioner's reply to enclosure (2), maintaining that the contested report should be removed, as it would not have been submitted, had the STENNIS report not been temporarily lost. f. In enclosure (4), PERS-811, the NPC enlisted advancements office, noted that including the STENNIS report in Petitioner's PMA computation would not have changed the result, as that report was 3.8, which was Petitioner's PMA (his PMA was computed using the average of the contested 3.6 report...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11416-08

    Original file (11416-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    11416-08 9 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : ‘REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: © (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by revising the enlisted performance’ evaluation report for 21 August 2007 to 15 March 2008 (copy at “Tab A). That any material directed to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03087-09

    Original file (03087-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 03087-03 7 August 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF 3 i Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removal of a nonjudicial punishment (NUP) of 1...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03363-09

    Original file (03363-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BIG Docket No: 3363-09 10 April 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: a See REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION) Ref: . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10301-09

    Original file (10301-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, | hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance ‘evaluation report for 16 June 2007 to 15 June 2008 (copy at Tab A) and the service record page 13 ("Administrative Remarks") entries dated 25 February and 17 June 2008 (copies at Tab B); and advancing her to SK2 (pay grade E-5). The Board, consisting of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02370-09

    Original file (02370-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 February to 17 August 2006 (copy at Tab A) and modifying the report for 1 February 2007 to 31 January 2008 (copy at Tab B) by changing the body composition entry in block 20 ("Physical Readiness") from "NS" (not within standards) to "MW" (medically waived),...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01238-09

    Original file (01238-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BJG Docket No: 1238-09 5 June 200609 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: