DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 7006-08
8 August 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of
your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of
the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 August 2008. After careful consideration
of your application, the Board concluded that your
application was not timely filed, and that it would not be
in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit
your application ina timely manner. In this regard, the
Board concluded that you were aware of the facts and
circumstances of your separation in February 1970, but did
not submit an application for correction of your record
until 2008,
You May request reconsideration of this decision. Your
request must include newly discovered relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available to you when you
submitted your application. The evidence may pertain to
the timeliness of your application or to its merits.
Absent such additional evidence, further review of your
application is not possible. oo
It is regretted that a more favorable reply cannot be made.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02951-08
A three-member panel olf the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 the Bo 2008. In addition, the decision of the Naval Discharge Review Board, which was sent td you on 12 June 1978, contains entries concerning the diagnosis| of schizoid personality, and the recommendation of a psychiatrist, dated 25 July 1969, that you be discharged by reason bf unsuitability. Your request must include newly dilscovered relevant evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10301-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 20 August 2007. On 14 September 2007 you received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00406-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The sentence included confinement, forfeitures of pay, reduction in rank, and a bad conduct discharge (BCD).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04911-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10301-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2008. The Board concluded that you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11886-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2009. The Board concluded that your belated decision to request retention in the Navy Reserve in lieu of discharge, and to undergo elective knee surgery, are insufficient to demonstrate that you were improperly found unfit for duty by the PEB, or to warrant rescinding the orders that directed your discharge from the Navy Reserve. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10882-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09417-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 22 October 1982, you reenlisted in the Navy at age 27. On 25 August 1984, the separation authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09942-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02176-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You subsequently requested an undesirable discharge (UD) for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial for the three periods of UA totaling 115 days. The Board also considered your contention that you contracted hepatitis C while in the Navy.