DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No. 02951-08
19 August 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant |to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel olf the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 14 the Bo 2008. After careful consideration of
your application, the Board concluded that your application was
not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of
justice to excuse your |failure to submit your application ina
timely manner.
The Board did not acceyt your contention to the effect that you
discovered the alleged jerror or injustice in your record in
2008, when you obtained a copy of your Navy health record. The
Board found that on 24 september 1968, you attached a copy of a
report of psychiatric evaluation to your request for
conscientious objector btatus. That report clearly states that
you had been diagnosed with a schizoid personality disorder.
Your service record alsb contains a copy of a letter dated
lL April 1970, in which you advised Senator Alan Cranston, in
part, that you had been| “recommended by Dr. Mc Dermott for
immediate discharge for psychiatric reasons as being completely
unsuitable for the Marine Corps”, and that Dr. McDermott felt
that you should have bedn discharged for psychiatric reasons in
1967. In addition, the decision of the Naval Discharge Review
Board, which was sent td you on 12 June 1978, contains entries
concerning the diagnosis| of schizoid personality, and the
recommendation of a psychiatrist, dated 25 July 1969, that you
be discharged by reason bf unsuitability.
You may request reconsideration of this decision. Your request
must include newly dilscovered relevant evidence which was not
reasonably available |to you when you submitted your application.
The evidence may pertlain to the timeliness of your application
or to its merits. Absent such additional evidence, further
review of your applicktion is not possible.
It is regretted that bh more favorable reply cannot be made.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN P
Executive
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00911-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant changes to your narrative reason for separation or reenlistment code because of your diagnosed personality disorder and nonrecommendation for retention or reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02571-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Further, regulations authorize assignment of an RE-3G reenlistment code to service members who are discharged due to a personality disorder and such a code is not considered derogatory. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00096-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 28 February 1969. Although a phobia may render a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05670-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application.on 15 April 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02012-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2002. You were discharged by reason of unsuitability/personality disorder on 19 October 1979. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05030-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful andconscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 21 June 1974. You were discharged from the Navy by...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100804
Patient is recommended for administrative separation due to Schizoid Personality Disorder … . ” Based on the medical diagnosis and recommendations from the Mental Health physicians, the Applicant’s command administratively processed him for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03657-09
material together with all material submitted in naval record, of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and applicable to the proceedings of considered by the Board consisted of your application, procedures this Documentary support thereof, your and policies. The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed your commanding officer to issue you a general discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to unsuitability as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019809
The applicant reported he might be AWOL, but it was because he was hospitalized at the Jackson VA Hospital for 30 days. The medical records were provided by the applicant's counsel to show the hospitalization locations, dates, diagnosis, and attending physicians. location date diagnosis/attending physician 130th Station Hospital Germany 1-14 May 1974 chronic undifferentiated schizophrenia (Dr. C____) Brooke Army Medical Center 16 May-5 June 1974 acute moderate undifferentiated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08479-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. circumstances in your case the Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.