Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04079-01
Original file (04079-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH:ecb
Docket No: 4079-01
11 September 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse
pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section

 

1552.

’s naval record

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 1 1 September 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse
’s naval
record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1760 MMSR-6J dated 23 August 2001, a
copy of which is attached.

Your allegations of error and

If a Reservist does not  

enrol.1 after. reaching 20 qualifying years it is presumed he

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. The Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) allows Reservists with 20
qualifying years of service to leave a portion of their retired pay to their eligible survivors in the
event they die before receiving retired pay at age 60. The RCSBP is strictly a voluntary
program.
decided not to make an election until age 60, at which time he is eligible to enroll in the
Survivor Benefit Plan. The reason for this is that RCSBP is just one of many estate planning
options available to members of the reserve component.
The decision to enroll in the program,
retlects an individual ’s judgement based upon his
or to select a particular level of participation,
or her unique facts and circumstances. Many members who are eligible to participate elect not
to do so either because of the cost of the program or because the individual has chosen other
means, such as life insurance, investments, pensions
provide for survivors.
In the absence of additional evidence, the fact that your husband chose
not to participate does not, in and of itself, establish an error or injustice warranting corrective
action.

fi-om civilian employment, or annuities, to

 

 

Docket No. 4079-01

’s non-participation was not

In addition, the fact that you were not notified of your husband
error. At the time, there was no statutory or regulatory requirement to notify a spouse of a
member’s non-election. As noted in the USMC advisory opinion, recent legislation changed the
RCSBP notification procedures, but this does not provide a basis for corrective action. The
recent change to the notification procedures confirms that Congress did not intend to require
spousal notification in the original enactment of RCSBP. Moreover, since the recent legislation
does not apply retroactively, it appears that Congress did not regard past cases where notice was
not provided as improper.
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

In this connection, the Board did not concur with the comments

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
The evidence presented does not establish an error or injustice warranting corrective action.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously  
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

cbnsidered by the Board.

In this regard, it is important

Sincerely,

W. DEAN P
Executive 

Direc

Enclosure



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00035

    Original file (BC-2007-00035.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00035 INDEX CODE: 137.04 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 June 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s marital status be changed from “single” to “married” in the year 2001, and that his records be changed to show he elected to participate in the...

  • CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2011-041

    Original file (2011-041.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

     If Option A is elected at time of 20 year satisfactory service letter, and spouse concurs, member will have an opportunity to elect into the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) at age 60. (B) Reserve-component annuity participants.--A person who (i) is eligible to participate in the Plan under paragraph (1)(B), and (ii) is married or has a dependent child when he is notified under section 12731(d) of this title that he has completed the years of 2 Pub. § 1448(a)(5), entitled “Participation by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00978

    Original file (BC-2007-00978.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her husband was notified of his eligibility to participate in the RCSBP by letter dated 28 December 1988. He made no election within 90 days of receipt of notification, and was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Deferred Election Until Age 60.” During the RCSBP Open Seasons 1 April 1992 through 31 March 1993, and 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2000, members who had elected less than full coverage or no coverage for their spouse/children were able to change their election to cover their...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019831

    Original file (20090019831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her late husband, a deceased former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected immediate annuity Reserve Component Survivors Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage. The applicant was the FSM's wife for 27 years. Unfortunately, at the time the FSM was issued his 20-year letter, the law stated that if a Reservist failed to make an election within 90 days of being issued a 20-year letter, the SBP election defaulted to option A, to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002540

    Original file (20090002540.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show she declined participation in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) and that she receive reimbursement for any and all deductions from her retirement pay. The 20-Year Letter, dated 28 July 2004, also stated that "NOTE: Public Law 106-398, 30 October 2000, requires that upon receipt of this Letter, a qualified Reserve Component member, who is married, will automatically be enrolled in the RCSBP under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011148C080407

    Original file (20070011148C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant further states that the FSM's original Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 Letter (20-Year Letter) and Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate (DD Form 1883) were not found in his records; however, she found copies of his 20 January 1999 20-Year Letter and an Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) Letter, dated 22 March 2000, which notified her that the FSM had failed to submit a DD Form 1883 within the prescribed timeframe and that she was therefore...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065902C070421

    Original file (2001065902C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Once a member elects either Options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable. The evidence of record shows that the applicant did complete a DD Form 1883 in 1991 enrolling in the RCSBP for spouse and children coverage. Although the applicant may not have been in troop unit at the time, he could have contacted a retirement services officer at the nearest military installation or contacted the Retired Activities Office, U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Center for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010696

    Original file (20090010696.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) when he received his Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (also known as the 20-year letter). On 20 May 1996, the FSM received his 20-Year Letter from the PAARNG stating he was eligible for retired pay at age 60 for he had completed over 20 years of qualifying service for nonregular...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06758-01

    Original file (06758-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 1 November 2001, a copy of which is attached. It was amended and d. A member who was eligible for retired pay under United States Code, Chapter 1223, on 30 September or who received by 30 June Title 10, 1978, but who was under age 60, 1979, a notification of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00217

    Original file (BC-2006-00217.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon contacting the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) regarding RCSBP benefits, she was told her spouse had not made an election for coverage at the time of his 20- year letter or during following open enrollment periods. She questions a letter her spouse had received dated 1 March 1999 from HQ ARPC notifying him of an RCSBP Open Enrollment period. The Board noted that the now- deceased former member received the initial RCSBP package at his home on 8 March 1989, and did not respond to it.