Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06250-08
Original file (06250-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON BC 20370-5100

JRE
Docket No. 06250-08
ii May 2009

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting iri executive session, considered your
application on 23 April 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. ~ ;
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you served on active duty in the Marine
Corps from 17 April 1980 to 20 August 1984, when you were
honorably released from.active duty and transferred to the
Marine Corps Reserve. You reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 1
May 1985. On.10 March 1989, you underwent a pre-separation
physical examination and were found qualified for duty. You did
not report any significant medical conditions or defects at that
time, and the physician who examined you did not record any
disqualifying conditions. You were separated from the Marine
Corps with a bad conduct discharge on 8 May 1990, pursuant to
the approved sentence of a special court-martial which convicted
you of numerous offenses, to include wrongful use of illegal
drugs, multiple unauthorized absence offenses, violations of
orders and disrespect to superior commissioned and
noncommissioned officers.

The Board concluded that there is no credible evidence that you
were suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder prior to your
bad conduct, discharge from the Marine Corps. It noted that you
did not report symptoms of a mental disorder when you applied
for reenlistment in 1985, or during your pre-separation physical
examination in 1989. In addition, the Board was not persuaded
that your misconduct was caused by, related to, or extenuated or
mitigated by an undiagnosed mental disorder. Accordingly, and
as you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of
justice for the Board to upgrade your discharge, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that

a presumption of regularity attaches to alli official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,
\ OAK cht = At

ROBERT D.~aZSALMAN _
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07721-09

    Original file (07721-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You had no military status during the period from 26 June 1979 to 19 December 1988. , The Board considered your application and all pertinent records in accordance with the provisions of SECNAV Instruction 5420.193, enclosure (1), Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (codified at 32 CFR 723), paragraph 3e. During the 1979-1989 period, you received treatment from VA health care providers for multiple conditions such as hip, back and knee pain, chronic recurrent foot pain,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00085-99

    Original file (00085-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 1999. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05402-07

    Original file (05402-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 13 August 1985. On 3 December 1985, a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00646-04

    Original file (00646-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of you application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulation and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entirerecord, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that enlisted in the Marine Corps on 8 February 1977. You received nonjudicial...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08797-09

    Original file (08797-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. Your receipt of a combined disability rating of 10% from the VA shortly after you were released from active duty is not probative of the existence of error or injustice in your naval record because those ratings were assigned without regard to the issue of your fitness for military duty on 25 June 1985. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04585-98

    Original file (04585-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit to perform the duties of your office, grade, rank or rating at the time of your discharge from the Marine Corps in 1973, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03068-03

    Original file (03068-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    on 13 December Following your discharge, the Department of Veterans Affairs denied your request for service connection for a mental disorder, after determining that you did not suffer from a mental disorder that was incurred in or aggravated by your military service. indicate that you were diagnosed or treated for a mental disorder during your enlistment, duty on 12 November 1982, physical examination. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05793-08

    Original file (05793-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01190-08

    Original file (01190-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11128-09

    Original file (11128-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    , The Board concluded that in view of your failure to disclose your pre-service history of posttraumatic stress disorder when you applied for enlistment, it would not be in the interest of justice to correct your record to show that you were retired by reason of physical disability due to posttraumatic stress disorder. In the Board’s opinion, the provisions of title 38, Code of Federal Regulations, part 4.129 (38CFR4.129) required VA rating officials to apply a convalescent rating, rather...