DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 5827-08
21 October 2009
_This is in reference to your.applicatien for correction of. your
naval. record pursuant to the provisions ‘Of title 10. of _the. |
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your |
application on 21 October 2009. After careful consideration of
your application, the Board concluded that your application was
not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of
justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a
timely manner. The Board concluded that you were aware of the
alleged error or injustice in your record in 1968, when you were
honorably released from active duty as an YNSN.
You may request reconsideration of this decision. Your request
‘must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not .
‘reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
The evidence may pertain to the timeliness of your application
or to its merits. Absent such additional evidence, further .
review of your application is not possible. The names and votes
of the members of the panel wiil be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that a more favorable reply cannot be made.
Sincerely,
tab
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Dil tor
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00536-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the , existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01792-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08761-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03798-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 31 January 2004, you reenlisted in the Navy at age 21 after a prior period of honorable service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04410-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2009. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06942-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 May 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10994-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04078-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ° Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or © injustice. Although the discharge documentation is not in your record, it appears that you requested discharge for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02170-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval - Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 16 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07758-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...