DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
HD:hd
Docket No. 05296-08
18 August 2008
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: @ i" iii .
REVIEW OF NAVAL RI
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 29 May 08 w/attachments
(2) PERS-311 memo dtd 9 Jul 08
(3) Subject's naval record
1.
Subject,
, filed enclosure (1) with
that the applicable naval
port for 17 October 2006 to
15 November 2007, a copy of which is at Tab B.
2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Humphrey and Messrs. W. Hicks
and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of erro
injustice on 14 August 2008, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies.
r and
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2),
Personnel Command (NPC)
subject matter addressed
the Navy
office having cognizance over the
in Petitioner's application has
commented to the effect that his request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an error warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
therefrom the following fitness report and related material,
leaving in the record the enlisted performance evaluation report
for 17 October 2006 to 15 November 2007:
Period of Report
From To
170ct06 15Nov06
Date of Report
12Nov07
b. That appropriate corrections be made to the magnetic
tape or microfilm maintained by NPC.
c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
d. That any material directed to ke removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
\o
W. DEAN PFE]
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06602-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 June to 20 September 2007, a copy of which is at Tab A. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08467-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the marks and comments of the enlisted performance evaluation report for 10 July 2005 to 15 March 2006 (copy at Tab A), in accordance with a letter dated 14 August 2008 from the reporting senior (at enclosure (1)) because the report erroneously reflected that he had failed the Spring...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR933-13
The Board, consisting of Ms. Lapinski and Messrs. Dikeman and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 March 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. f. In enclosure (6), PERS-32, the NPC office with cognizance over performance evaluations, commented to the effect that in light of enclosures (4) and (5), Petitioner’s performance evaluation record should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03599-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the date of rank on his commission as a lieutenant, U. S. Navy Reserve, as 1 June 2002, vice 11 February 2003; and that the date of rank and effective date of his promotion to lieutenant commander be adjusted from 1 September 2008 to 1 April 2008. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hess,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07615-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the original enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 April 2007 to 15 April 2008 and the letter of transmittal forwarding a supplemental report for the same period, so that the supplemental report will be the only report in his record for the period involved. The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11416-08
11416-08 9 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : ‘REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: © (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by revising the enlisted performance’ evaluation report for 21 August 2007 to 15 March 2008 (copy at “Tab A). That any material directed to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01174-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness reports for 1 February to 10 May 2006 (copy in enclosure (1)), 11 May 2006 to 31 January 2007 (copy at Tab A) and 1 February to 31 July 2007 (copy at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Humberd and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4968 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. af a CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds an error warranting removal of the report ending 31 March 2008, rather than the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07781-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 November 2007 to 29 March 2008, a copy of which is at Tab'A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 July 2009, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08777-08
In enclosures (2) and (3), OPNAV N135 and the NPC office with cognizance over fitness reports, respectively, commented to the effect Petitioner's requests should be denied. e. In enclosure (6), the NPC office with cognizance over fitness reports noted that Petitioner's reporting senior had declined to submit a supplemental report, notwithstanding the PRIMS correction. In enclosure (9), that office noted the fitness report corrections recommended in enclosure (6} and stated hig SSB request...