DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
HD :hd
Docket No. 05039-08
13 February 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 February 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval
Operations dated 30 June 2008 with enclosure, a copy of which is
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion,
noting the Physical Readiness Information Management System
(PRIMS) record shows no data for Fall 2005. Accordingly, your
application las been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
tt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable acbion cannot be tasxen. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Int :
W. DEAN PFET
Executive Di t
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05588-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 18 July and 3 December 2008, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06320-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting application on 2 injustice were r regulations and Board. in executive session, considered your February 2009. In addition, the Board considered the furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00285-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS , 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD: hd Docket No. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 2 February 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12202-09
You request promotion to lieutenant commander with an effective date of 24 July 2009. AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2010. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00073-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10087-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 24 November 2008 with attachments (your fitness reports for 17 August 2007 to 29 February 2008 and 1 April to 16 May 2008), a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04366-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 17 June 2009 with enclosure and the Navy Personnel Command dated 26 June 2009, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04227-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00034-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 30 April 2009. The Board also considered your letters dated 9 and 13 April 2009. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04021-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2NAVY ANNEX . A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2010. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official “naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.