Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05008-08
Original file (05008-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECO
2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON Dc 20370-51 00
Docket No. 95008-08

RDS

 

Chairman , Board for Correction of Naval Records

     
   

From:
To: secretary of the Navy
Subj . REVIEW
OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149
1 record

 

(2) Subject 's nava

(a), Subject,
(1) with

corrected to &
by reason of physica

a wae and eee

2. The Board,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8
-4tg regulations, determined that

January 2009 and, pursuant t
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
idered by

available evidence of record. Docum
the Board consisted of the enclosures,

applicable statutes, regulations and p

consisting of Messrs.

olicies.

cts of record

11 the fa
d injustice

g reviewed a
ations of error an

3. The Board, havin
'g alleg

pertaining to Petitioner
finds as follows:

hin the Departm

b. Petitioner served on activ
8 March 1996, when he was tra

November 1992 to

Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with a

rating of 30% for a psychotic disorder, not otherwise speci

On 14 January 1997, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
moa 10%: rating for the psychotic disorder, and added a

for residuals of a right ankle sprain. On 9 Apeel

physical ard, directed that

fied.

awarded hi
rating of 20%

2005, the President, Evaluation Bo
Petitioner’s name be removed from the TDRL, and that he be
discharged from the Navy without entitlement to disability
benefits provided by title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, based on
his failure to appear for a periodic physical examination. On 3
April 2007, the VA confirmed the 10% rating for the psychotic
disorder, and reduced the rating for the ankle sprain to 10%.

c. Petitioner contends, in effect, that he was not notified
of his scheduled physical examination because the PEB did not
have his correct address, even though he had submitted and

address change.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
resolving doubt in Petitioner’s favor, the Board concludes that
Petitioner remained unfit for duty as of 7 April 2005, and that
it would be in the interest of justice to excuse his failure to
report for a required physical examination, and to correct his
record to show that he was discharged by reason of physical
disability with entitlement to severance pay. corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
on 7 April 2005, he was discharged by reason of physical
disability with entitlement to severance pay pursuant to 10 U.S.
Code 1203, with a 10% rating under VA code 9210 for a psychotic
disorder not otherwise specified.

b. That so much of Petitioner's request for correction of his
record as exceeds the foregoing be and hereby is denied.

c. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

| Ute a-=_

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN EXNICIOS
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

ls Suk

W. DEAN PFEIFF

tw

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06262-09

    Original file (06262-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    06262-09 14 August 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Pon Subj: FORME ’ REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Purguant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was retired by reason of physical disability, vice administratively discharged. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01160-99

    Original file (01160-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Y 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 203704100 JRE Docket No: 1160-99 21 June 2000 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Ms. Nofziger and Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 May regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04026-01

    Original file (04026-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD ANNEX NAVY 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S JRE Docket No: 4026-01 20 February 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW UF NAVAL RECORD .“__ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was retained on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11031-06

    Original file (11031-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his name was not removed from the Temporary Disability Retired List. He contends, in effect, that his custodian did not keep the Marine Corp apprised of his which caused him to miss his periodic physical address, which in turn resulted in the removal of his name examination, from the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06988-98

    Original file (06988-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 6988-98 23 August 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL REC-RD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bartlett, Ensley and Schultz, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 August 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01079

    Original file (PD2010-01079.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    During treatment the CI was diagnosed with PTSD in addition to her Anxiety Disorder. The mental health symptoms from PTSD and Generalized Anxiety Disorder were not independently evaluated or separated regarding individual contribution to disability by any examiner. Therefore, all of the CI’s mental health symptoms and disability are considered under the CI’s unfitting PTSD rating.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01134-00

    Original file (01134-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was discharged by reason of physical disability. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner, Swarens and Whitener, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07024-10

    Original file (07024-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that his name was not removed from the Temporary Disability Retired List and that he was not discharged from the Marine Corps. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Neuschafer and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 April 2011 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08590-07

    Original file (08590-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was not released from active duty on 30 June 2005. The Director concluded that Petitioner had provided insufficient documentation to warrant recommending that her request be granted “due to indications that petitioner was not unfit for continued Naval service despite having been disqualified from flight status.” The Director stated that should additional records become available that are “indicative of active...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Sep 25 10_02_16 CDT 2000

    On 31 January 1995, the Record Review Panel of the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) made preliminary findings that Petitioner was unfit for duty because of left foot pain, which it rated at 20 under VA code 5272, for ankylosis of the subastragalar (subtalar) or tarsal joint in poor weight-bearing position. Captain L’s opinion, after reviewing four medical board reports (there were actually five medical boards, dated March 1993, 8 December 1993, 26 August 1994, 22 November 1994 and 5 April...