Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04723-08
Original file (04723-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

MEH
Docket No. 4723-08
14 Jul 08

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD IcO | _
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl DD Form 149 w/attachments

(1)

(2) CNRC memo 1133 Ser 32/ of 5 Mar 08
(3) CNRC memo 1133 Ser 32/

(4) Excerpts from Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board

requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show that he enlisted in pay grade E-3, vice E-1, based on college

credits.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and ZSsalman,
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 July
2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies. Petitioner's request for a personal appearance before the

Board was also considered.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations

within the Department of the Navy.

b. The issues in the case are adequately documented and a

personal appearance would not materially add to the Board’s
understanding of the issues involved. Thus, Petitioner’s request for

a personal appearance is denied.
Docket No. 4723-08

c. Petitioner is a native of Nigeria and had been in the United

States approximately 6 months when he enlisted in the Navy. His
enlistment contract shows that he voluntarily enlisted in pay grade

E-1 on 26 March 2007.

d. Petitioner alleges he should have been enlisted in pay grade
E-3 based on qualifying college credits earned prior to his
enlistment.

e. COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 1130.8G establishes criteria for
enlistment in an advanced pay grade. Personnel with the requisite
number of qualifying college credits to meet the advanced pay grade
criteria are required to present official transcripts prior to the
date they are to ship to recruit training. Foreign education must be
evaluated by an education specialist to determine if it meets the
appropriate accreditation criteria. If transcripts cannot be obtained,
through no fault of the member, a statement must be entered on the DD
Form 1966. Applicants must sign this statement acknowledging it is

their responsibility to produce the required transcripts prior to
graduation from recruit training. Authorization for advanced pay

grade is cancelled upon graduation from recruit training if the
transcripts have not been provided.

f. Prior to being accepted for enlistment, a prospective recruit
must complete and certify a DD Form 1966 ((Record of Military
Processing). A notation on Petitioner’s DD Form 1966 shows that only
high school transcripts had been provided to the recruiting officials.
“No entry was made reflecting review of any of college transcripts.

The 1966/2 lists National Grammar school (Nigerian equivalent to U.S.
high school). No college is listed; and the NAVCRUIT 1133/51, Request
for Evaluation of Non-Traditional Education Credentials and Foreign
Education, notes Petitioner’s education code as “12L” High School
Diploma Graduate, and further notes “None” for Advanced Pay Grade

Eligibility based on foreign education.

g. Petitioner signed a NAVPERS 1070/613, Advanced Pay Grade
Eligibility record entry dated 26 March 2007. On the NAVPERS 1070/613
Petitioner acknowledged that he had read the advanced pay grade
program eligibility requirements and understood that, in order to
qualify for advanced pay grade to E~3 he must have completed 48
semester hours of college credits at an accredited educational
institution. After acknowledging the above, Petitioner initialed the
form stating “I am NOT eligible for Advanced Pay Grade.”
Docket No. 4723-08

h. On 17 March 2008 Petitioner’s case was presented to the Board
and, based on the above and the advisory opinion from Commander, Navy
Recruiting Command (CNRC) of 5 March 2008 found in enclosure (2),

Petitioner’s application was denied.

i. On 7 May 2008 Petitioner requested a reconsideration of his
case based on the submission of supplemental information explaining
that he had not provided college transcripts earlier due to civil

unrest in Nigeria.

j. The case was reopened and returned to CNRC for a supplemental
advisory opinion in light of the “new” material. By enclosure (3),
CNRC once again recommends that no relief be granted. CNRC notes that
the DD Form 1966 shows no entry reflecting college education. No
college transcripts were provided prior to shipping for recruit
training. Also, the NAVCRUIT 1133/51, Request for Evaluation of Non-
Traditional Education Credentials and Foreign Education indicated

“None” for advanced pay grade.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
notwithstanding the comments contained in enclosures (2) and (3), the
Board concludes that Petitioner’s request warrants favorable action.
In the Board's view, a prospective recruit, with qualifying college
credit, would not knowingly enlist in pay grade E-1 if in fact he
fully understood that he was eligible for enlistment in an advanced
pay grade based on that college credit. The Board was of the opinion
that because Petitioner had actually earned college credit before
enlisting, he should receive an advanced pay grade at enlistment for
that college credit notwithstanding the evidence that information and
evidence of such college credit was omitted from his enlistment
application and his enlistment contract. The Board finds that the
difficulties Petitioner described in obtaining official transcripts
from Nigeria, a country experiencing political unrest and associated
violence, militated in favor of excusing the omissions from the
enlistment documents. The Board also notes that the education, while
received at a foreign institution, nevertheless met criteria

established for advanced pay grade.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:
Docket No. 4723-08

a. He enlisted in pay grade E-3, vice E-1, effective 26 March
2007 (Active Duty Service Date). Petitioner met the criteria for
advanced pay grade based on college credits. NOTE: The change in the
effective date of advancement to E-3 may also impact on Petitioner’s
E-4 advancement opportunity. If Petitioner was eligible for, but did
not take and E-4 examination because the above change had not yet been
made, the following procedures will apply to remediate that missed
opportunity. Petitioner should take the next available E-4
examination. Then compare the Final Multiple Score (FMS) received on

that examination with the FMS that was required for the “missed”
examination. If the score received meets or exceeds the score that

was previously required for advancement Petitioner may reapply to this
Board for consideration of advancement to E-4 retroactive to the date
he would have been advanced on the “missed” examination cycle. A
command endorsement/recommendation and a copy of this letter must be
included. The Board will determine whether the request warrants

favorable action.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board

for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and

complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled

AMS.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, ~III

Recorder Acting Recorder

Bi. The foregoing action of the Board is submitted for your review
and action.

   
 

W. DEAN PFEIL
Executive Dir

Reviewed and approved:

-_
X. C&.
Vr As- o8
Robert T. Cali

Assistant General Counsel
Manpower and Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05373-08

    Original file (05373-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1, based on college credits earned in foreign institutions prior to her enlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 July 2008 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01970-08

    Original file (01970-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice E-1, based on college credits. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04829-08

    Original file (04829-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice E-1, based on college credits. To support his application, he submitted official college transcripts showing that between December 2005 and April 2007, prior to his enlistment, he had earned 35 hours of college credit at Miami University and Morehead...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08838-10

    Original file (08838-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. To change the contract, Petitioner executed NAVCRUIT 1133/52, Annex C to the DD Form 4. The entry of “NAVY COLLEGE FUND GUARANTEE $21000.00 (JUN 09)” in the NAVCRUIT 1133/52, Annex C must necessarily be an erroneous combination of the three possible options.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10668-08

    Original file (10668-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 June 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 10668-08 e. Official transcripts are the only documents acceptable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07144-09

    Original file (07144-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner signed and executed DD Form 4/3 acknowledging he was voluntarily enlisting in paygrade E-1, but now alleges he should have been enlisted in paygrade E-3 based on college credits earned prior to his enlistment. g. On 24 November 2008 Petitioner signed an “Advanced Paygrade Enlistment Statement of Understanding” indicating he was NOT eligible for Advanced Paygrade. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01680-09

    Original file (01680-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1, based on college credits. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 June 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00277-09

    Original file (00277-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: {1} DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) CNRC memo 1133 Ser 32/ of 16 Apr 09 (3} Subject’s naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice E-1, based on college credits. The Board, consisting of Messrs, George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09026-07

    Original file (09026-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC 1133 Ser N53l2/09056 of 2 Jun 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06016-09

    Original file (06016-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Navy Recruiting Command's established policy requires all applicants desiring enlistment in a higher paygrade produce official transcripts prior to their ship date. Recruiters brief all applicants...