DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
- JRE
Docket No. 04603-08
12 January 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552. You contend that you were
permanently retired by reason of physical disability with a
disability rating of 60%.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 8 January 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this regard, the Board found although you
transferred to the Temporary Disability Retired List on 12
December 1985 with a rating of 60%, your condition was
reevaluated in 1989, and the rating was reduced to 30%. As
indicated in the enclosed Record of Proceeding of the Hearing
Panel dated 3 May 1989, you accepted that rating.
In view of the foregoing, and as you have not demonstrated that
your disability was ratable at 60% at the time of your permanent
cetirement, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective
action in your case. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
2 Dd oe
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04071-09
, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07762-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2011. You accepted those findings on 10 January 1989, and were honorably discharged from the Marine Corps on 17 February 1989 Following your discharge, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) awarded you a 10% rating for the flat feet condition, and denied your request for service connection fora bilateral knee condition. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05308-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. 05308-06 16 July 2007 Dear
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07447-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. As you have not demonstrated that your kidney condition should have been rated above 30% disabling when you were permanently retired in 1983, or that you were entitled to a separate rating for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08646-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01091-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2008. The record shows that in 1991, the Board denied your request for an increase in your disability rating to 30% anda disability retirement. You are now requesting that your record be corrected to show that you were not discharged on 31 January 1990 with disability severance pay but transferred to the Retired Reserve with eligibility for retired pay at age 60.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00745-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2009. The Board found that your final disability rating was based on an assessment of the level of impairment caused by your disabilities, rather than on the number of years of creditable service you completed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05573-09
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10803-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting~in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2010. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you should have been permanently retired on 26 August 1987, vice 1 June ‘1989, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07956-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2009. In this regard, the Board concluded that you were properly discharged with a disability rating on 20% for a seizure disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.