DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TIR
Docket No: 3314-08
9 July 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 8 July 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable Statutes, regulations,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
You reenlisted in the Naval Reserve on 18 August 2001 and
continued to serve without disciplinary incident until May 2002.
In this regard, during the period from May 2002 to January 2003
you failed to pay just debts resulting from unauthorized use of a
government credit card. As a result, you were notified of
pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to
a pattern of misconduct. Presumably, at that time you waived
use of a government credit card. Subsequently, the discharge
authority approved this recommendation and directed separation
under honorable conditions. In April 2003 you were so discharged
and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
your just debts and would now like to reenlist. Nevertheless,
the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant
a change of your reenlistment code because of the seriousness of
your repetitive misconduct. Further, Sailors discharged by
reason of misconduct normally receive discharges under other than
honorable conditions, so the Board concluded you were fortunate
to receive a general discharge. Finally, an RE-4 reenlistment
code is required when a Sailor is discharged by reason of
misconduct. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Lo Wea
Executive Diteckdar
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11291-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 August 2011. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change of your reenlistment status because of your failure to satisfactorily attend scheduled drills and misconduct as evidenced by your failure to pay just debts and misuse of a government credit card. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07418-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve and began a period of active duty on 19 January 2000, and served...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11532-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2009. Since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of your reentry code. official records.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00979-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 December 1994, you were advised that your commanding officer was recommending you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to misconduct. In this regard, an RE-4 reentry code is required when an andividual is discharged for misconduct and is not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05669-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 31 July 2002 at age 19 and served for a year and three months without...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08811-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After waiving your procedural right to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB), your commanding officer recommended discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07627-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2008. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board did not consider upgrading your discharge or changing the reason for your discharged because you are required to have these issues...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06484-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your commanding officer recommended your request be approved, and on 2 August 2004 the discharge authority directed an honorable discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to a reduction in force. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02003-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000579
The Separation Authority determined that the preponderance of the evidence supported the basis for discharge and that separation from the Naval Service was warranted; as such, he directed that the basis for separation on the DD Form 214 be Misconduct - Pattern of Misconduct. The Separation Authority further directed that the Applicant be discharged with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of his service and that he receive an RE-4 reenlistment code (not recommended for...